Literature DB >> 9018314

Computing genetic similarity coefficients from RAPD data: the effects of PCR artifacts.

W F Lamboy1.   

Abstract

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers have been used for many types of genetic analyses, including genome mapping, genotype fingerprinting, phylogeny reconstruction, and measuring genetic similarities. They suffer from one potential limitation, however, because the PCR that is used to produce informative amplification products often produces artifactual products as well. Optimization of PCR protocols to eliminate artifactual bands completely is often too costly or too time-consuming to be practical. Other methods for handling RAPD artifacts, such as deleting inconsistent or faint bands or using only those bands that are reproducible, introduce false negatives into the data. Simply ignoring artifacts and using all bands introduces false positives. When RAPD data are used to compute genetic similarity coefficients, such artifacts can cause significant bias in the estimation. The three coefficients most widely used with RAPD data, the simple matching coefficient, Jaccard's coefficient and Nei and Li's coefficient, differ in the amount of bias produced by a given level of artifactual bands. The simple matching coefficient and Nei and Li's coefficient always exhibit less percent bias than Jaccard's coefficient. For closely related organisms, Nei and Li's coefficient displays less percent bias than the simple matching coefficient. If new DNA samples possessing RAPD markers not present in the previously analyzed samples are added to a study, values of the simple matching coefficient will need to be computed for all samples, not just the new ones. Jaccard's and Nei and Li's coefficients, however, will not need to be recomputed. Furthermore, only Nei and Li's coefficient has a direct biological meaning (it is an estimate of the expected proportion of amplified fragments shared by two samples because they were inherited from a common ancestor). On the basis of these results, Nei and Li's coefficient is recommended for routine computation of genetic similarities using RAPD data, particularly if PCR artifacts are present.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 9018314     DOI: 10.1101/gr.4.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PCR Methods Appl        ISSN: 1054-9803


  13 in total

1.  PCR-based fingerprinting using AFLPs as a tool for studying genetic relationships in Lactuca spp.

Authors:  M Hill; H Witsenboer; M Zabeau; P Vos; R Kesseli; R Michelmore
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Impact of scoring error and reproducibility RAPD data on RAPD based estimates of genetic distance.

Authors:  P Skroch; J Nienhuis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Amplification-based DNA fingerprinting: from artifactual to definitive typing and in between.

Authors:  A van Belkum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Factors affecting reliability and reproducibility of amplification-based DNA fingerprinting of representative bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  K D Tyler; G Wang; S D Tyler; W M Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of RAPD markers correlated with chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  P Lescuyer; S Picot; V Bracchi; J Burnod; J Austin; A Pérard; P Ambroise-Thomas
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Derived Techniques.

Authors:  Kantipudi Nirmal Babu; Thotten Elampilay Sheeja; Divakaran Minoo; Muliyar Krishna Rajesh; Kukkamgai Samsudeen; Erinjery Jose Suraby; Illathidath Payatatti Vijesh Kumar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

7.  Multiple introductions from the Iberian peninsula are responsible for invasion of Crupina vulgaris in western North America.

Authors:  T Garnatje; R Vilatersana; C T Roché; N Garcia-Jacas; A Susanna; D C Thill
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Multicenter evaluation of arbitrarily primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  A van Belkum; J Kluytmans; W van Leeuwen; R Bax; W Quint; E Peters; A Fluit; C Vandenbroucke-Grauls; A van den Brule; H Koeleman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Virulence and molecular diversity in Colletotrichum graminicola from Brazil.

Authors:  H M Valèrio; M A Rèsende; R C B Weikert-Oliveira; C R Casela
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.574

10.  Genetic diversity in recent elite faba bean lines using AFLP markers.

Authors:  Mahmoud Zeid; Chris-Carolin Schön; Wolfgang Link
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.