Literature DB >> 901697

Intravenous fluids in medical in-patients.

D H Lawson.   

Abstract

1 Data from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program were reviewed to determine the proportion of patients receiving intravenous fluids in the participating hospitals. 2 Wide differences between hospitals in the United States and four other countries were observed: i.v. fluids being given to 54% of patients in one American hospital and only 7% of patients in an Israeli one. A two-fold difference in the frequency of i.v. fluid use in two otherwise comparable Scottish teaching hospitals was observed. This difference was not due to observed patient characteristics, did not arise from selection bias or observational differences between the two hospitals and was unlikely to have arisen by chance. 3 It is concluded that the findings were due to different policies on the part of the attending physicians. Although the study could not be used to evaluate the beneficial effects of the administered fluids, adverse effects were common (15% of recipients) and in some instances potentially serious. Adverse effects were reported more frequently after infusion of 5% dextrose (13% of recipients) than after isotonic saline (7%) perhaps because of the low pH of the former solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 901697      PMCID: PMC1429064          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb00716.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  10 in total

1.  Conferences and meetings: royal college of surgeons at bristol.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1967-01-14

2.  Drug prescribing in hospitals: an international comparison.

Authors:  D H Lawson; H Jick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Effect of pH on the incidence of infusion thrombophlebitis.

Authors:  G Elfving; K Saikku
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1966-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Drug surveillance utilizing epidemiologic methods. A report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program.

Authors:  R R Miller
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1973-07

5.  Risk of local and systemic infection with polyethylene intravenous catheters. A prospective study of 213 catheterizations.

Authors:  R N Collins; P A Braun; S H Zinner; E H Kass
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Detrimental effects of particulate matter on the pulmonary circulation.

Authors:  S J Turco; N M Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1971-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Complications of intravenous infusions.

Authors:  A Riyami
Journal:  J Ir Med Assoc       Date:  1968-01

8.  Comprehensive drug surveillance.

Authors:  H Jick; O S Miettinen; S Shapiro; G P Lewis; V Siskind; D Slone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1970-08-31       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Secondary septicaemia from intravenous cannulae.

Authors:  J H Darrell; L P Garrod
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-05-24

10.  Strange effects of "dextrose 5 percent in water".

Authors:  C A Clemetson; M M Moshfeghi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-02-06       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  A Quantitative Approach to Dilutional Anemia.

Authors:  Andrew J Hale; Daniel N Ricotta; Shoshana J Herzig; Jeffrey H William; Jason A Freed
Journal:  J Hematol (Brossard)       Date:  2019-06-30

2.  Study of prescription of injectable drugs and intravenous fluids to inpatients in a teaching hospital in Western Nepal.

Authors:  Sudesh Gyawali; P Ravi Shankar; Archana Saha; Lalit Mohan
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2009-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.