Literature DB >> 9016424

Positive predictive value of clinical suspicion for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Implications for use of ultrasonography.

C E Kahn1, F A Quiroz.   

Abstract

To measure the positive predictive value (PPV) of clinical suspicion of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), as confirmed by ultrasonography, we reviewed the records of 343 patients at a university medical center referred to ultrasonography for newly suspected AAA. Positive predictive value was 11.1% for large aneurysms of at least 5.0 cm and 18.7% for aneurysms of at least 3.5 cm, and was higher for men and older patients. For patients under 50 years of age, PPV was only 2.6%. Ultrasonography for clinically suspected AAA has a low positive predictive yield, particularly for men under age 50 and for women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9016424     DOI: 10.1007/bf02598992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  19 in total

1.  Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  L L LaRoy; P J Cormier; T A Matalon; S K Patel; D A Turner; B Silver
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Natural history of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  H Glimåker; L Holmberg; A Elvin; O Nybacka; B Almgren; C G Björck; I Eriksson
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-04

3.  Oxford screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 to 74 years.

Authors:  J Collin; L Araujo; J Walton; D Lindsell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-09-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a study of incidence and mortality.

Authors:  G Johansson; J Swedenborg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Accuracy of ultrasonographic measurement of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  G J Akkersdijk; J B Puylaert; E G Coerkamp; A C de Vries
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms with physical examination and ultrasound.

Authors:  F A Lederle; J M Walker; D B Reinke
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-08

7.  Ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of surgical decisions for cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  H Bengtsson; D Bergqvist; S Jendteg; B Lindgren; U Persson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men ages 60 to 80 years. A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  P S Frame; D G Fryback; C Patterson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  P R Thomas; R D Stewart
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  The periodic physical examination in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  S K Oboler; F M LaForce
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

1.  Looking for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  F A Lederle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.