Literature DB >> 9013914

Reduction in aortic aneurysm size: early results after endovascular graft placement. EVT Investigators.

J S Matsumura1, W H Pearce, W J McCarthy, J S Yao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous reports demonstrate initial technical success with transluminally placed endovascular grafts (TPEG) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, long-term changes in the size of the aorta and aneurysmal segments are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine aortic dimensions at several levels by computed tomographic (CT) scans 1 year after TPEG.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients underwent TPEG with 1-year CT scans. Patients were divided into three groups: group I, no perigraft leak; group II, early perigraft leak that sealed during the first year; and group III, persistent perigraft leak. Aortic minor and major diameters, perimeter, and area were measured at four locations: the celiac aorta, proximal neck, maximal aneurysm size, and distal neck.
RESULTS: There were 32 men and two women, with a mean age of 73 +/- 8 years. In group I there were 20 patients (58%), and groups II and III had seven patients (21%) each. The overall mean aneurysm minor diameter decreased from 4.79 +/- 0.68 cm at implantation to 4.39 +/- 0.86 cm at 1 year (p < 0.0001). The aneurysm sac decreased by 0.63 +/- 0.58 cm in group I, and by 0.34 +/- 0.24 cm in group II. In group III, however, the aneurysm sac increased by 0.19 +/- 0.21 cm. Aneurysm size change did not correlate with inferior mesenteric or lumbar artery patency. The dimensions of the celiac aorta and proximal neck did not change significantly. However, diameter of the distal neck enlarged by 0.12 +/- 0.27 cm (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: TPEG exclusion is associated with reduction of aneurysm size 1 year after implantation. Expansion of the aneurysms occurred with persistent perigraft leak. The aortic size at the celiac artery and proximal neck did not change. Dilation of the distal neck was minor but requires further long-term follow-up to determine clinical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9013914     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70327-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the proximal aortic neck enlargement following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: 3-years experience.

Authors:  Vinicio Napoli; Savino G Sardella; Irene Bargellini; Pasquale Petruzzi; Roberto Cioni; Claudio Vignali; Mauro Ferrari; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Use of spiral computed tomographic angiography in monitoring abdominal aortic aneurysms after transfemoral endovascular repair.

Authors:  R Balm; M J Jacobs
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1997

Review 3.  Current status of endoluminal grafting for exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The beauty and the beast.

Authors:  E B Diethrich
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1998

4.  In Vivo Molecular Characterization of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Fibrin-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  René M Botnar; Julia Brangsch; Carolin Reimann; Christian H P Janssen; Reza Razavi; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  A comparative study of the bell-bottom technique vs hypogastric exclusion for the treatment of aneurysmal extension to the iliac bifurcation.

Authors:  Peter A Naughton; Michael S Park; Elrasheid A H Kheirelseid; Sean M O'Neill; Heron E Rodriguez; Mark D Morasch; Prakash Madhavan; Mark K Eskandari
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Factors affecting the regression of surgically replaced abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Masahiro Matsushita; Teruo Ikezawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Modular bifurcation endoprosthesis for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  R A White; C E Donayre; I Walot; G E Kopchok; E Wilson; M Heilbron; F Hussain; C deVirgilio; R Buwalda; T J Fogarty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models.

Authors:  J D Humphrey; C A Taylor
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Length of abdominal aortic aneurysm and incidence of endoleaks type II after endovascular repair.

Authors:  Dinh Dong Nghi Phan; Frank Meyer; Maciej Pech; Zuhir Halloul
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 1.704

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.