Literature DB >> 9013456

Control of cytomegalovirus-associated morbidity in renal transplant patients using intensive monitoring and either preemptive or deferred therapy.

D C Brennan1, K A Garlock, B A Lippmann, R S Buller, M Gaudreault-Keener, J A Lowell, S B Miller, S Shenoy, T K Howard, G A Storch.   

Abstract

The objective of this randomized, prospective study was to compare preemptive to deferred treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in high-risk renal transplant recipients. Conducted at a university-affiliated transplant center, the study included 36 renal allograft recipients with donor or recipient CMV-seropositivity who received anti-thymocyte induction therapy. Ganciclovir was administered intravenously for 21 days upon detection of CMV viremia (preemptive, N = 15) or detection of CMV viremia associated with a CMV syndrome (deferred, N = 21). Shell vial culture, conventional culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed upon buffy-coat specimens weekly for 12 to 16 wk. CMV and non-CMV-associated charges were calculated. The comparative sensitivities of PCR, shell vial culture, and conventional culture were 91%, 44%, and 47%, respectively. A delay in specimen processing of > 24 h severely compromised the sensitivity of culture techniques but not that of PCR. Preemptive therapy tended to decrease symptomatic CMV episodes (0.4 versus 0.6 episodes per patient randomized; P = 0.22). One patient in each group had organ involvement, and no patient died. Allograft function and survival were similar. Ganciclovir use was increased in the preemptive group (1.2 versus 0.6 courses per patient randomized; P = 0.02). CMV-associated charges were $10,368 (preemptive) versus $5,752 (deferred); P = 0.13. PCR is superior to conventional monitoring to detect CMV viremia. Culture cannot be considered the "gold standard" for detection of CMV viremia, especially when transport of specimens over distances results in processing delays. Preemptive therapy may reduce symptomatic CMV infections in renal transplant recipients. It was associated with higher CMV-related charges but equivalent overall charges versus deferred treatment with intensive monitoring. Either strategy can achieve control of CMV infection after renal transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9013456     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V81118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV) PCR in plasma and CMV antigenemia assay: clinical utility of the prototype AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR test in transplant recipients.

Authors:  A M Caliendo; K St George; S Y Kao; J Allega; B H Tan; R LaFontaine; L Bui; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir following administration of valganciclovir in paediatric renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Véronique Baudouin; Daolun Zhang; Georges Deschênes; Chantal Le Guellec; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Effects of storage temperature and time on qualitative and quantitative detection of cytomegalovirus in blood specimens by shell vial culture and PCR.

Authors:  T C Roberts; R S Buller; M Gaudreault-Keener; K E Sternhell; K Garlock; G G Singer; D C Brennan; G A Storch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  I G Sia; R Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Ganciclovir: an update of its use in the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients.

Authors:  J K McGavin; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Cost-effectiveness model of cytomegalovirus management strategies in renal transplantation. Comparing valaciclovir prophylaxis with current practice.

Authors:  J A Mauskopf; A Richter; L Annemans; G Maclaine
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Impact of prophylactic versus preemptive valganciclovir on long-term renal allograft outcomes.

Authors:  Michael L Spinner; Georges Saab; Ed Casabar; Lyndsey J Bowman; Gregory A Storch; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Pre-emptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viraemia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Daniel S Owers; Angela C Webster; Giovanni F M Strippoli; Kathy Kable; Elisabeth M Hodson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

9.  A prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparison of thymoglobulin versus Atgam for induction immunosuppressive therapy: 10-year results.

Authors:  Karen L Hardinger; Sunny Rhee; Paula Buchanan; Matt Koch; Brent Miller; Decha Enkvetchakul; Rebecca Schuessler; Mark A Schnitzler; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation: economic implications.

Authors:  Ananya Das
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.