PURPOSE: To evaluate contrast enhancement of normal extraocular muscles in the orbit. METHODS: Noncontrast and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images of the orbit were acquired using a fat-suppression MR technique in eight patients with no orbital disease. Contrast enhancement of 64 extraocular muscles was evaluated and compared with that of 16 temporal muscles. RESULTS: Compared with temporal muscles, all extraocular muscles markedly enhanced after administration of contrast material. CONCLUSIONS: Because normal extraocular muscles enhanced markedly with contrast material, more attention should be paid to these muscles when using contrast-enhanced, fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR imaging to evaluate pathologic conditions.
PURPOSE: To evaluate contrast enhancement of normal extraocular muscles in the orbit. METHODS: Noncontrast and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images of the orbit were acquired using a fat-suppression MR technique in eight patients with no orbital disease. Contrast enhancement of 64 extraocular muscles was evaluated and compared with that of 16 temporal muscles. RESULTS: Compared with temporal muscles, all extraocular muscles markedly enhanced after administration of contrast material. CONCLUSIONS: Because normal extraocular muscles enhanced markedly with contrast material, more attention should be paid to these muscles when using contrast-enhanced, fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR imaging to evaluate pathologic conditions.
Authors: Daniel Ivan; Stefanie Ohlerth; Henning Richter; Dagmar Verdino; Antonella Rampazzo; Simon Pot Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 2.741