Literature DB >> 9010419

Chronic electrical stimulation of the gasserian ganglion for the relief of pain in a series of 34 patients.

E Taub1, M Munz, R R Tasker.   

Abstract

The use of an implanted system for chronic electrical stimulation of the gasserian ganglion for relief of facial pain was described in 1980 by Meyerson and Håkansson. Between 1982 and 1995, the senior author (R.R.T.) performed gasserian ganglion stimulation in 34 patients for the relief of chronic medically intractable facial pain. The etiology of pain was peripheral damage to the trigeminal nerve in 22 patients (65%), central (stroke) damage in seven (21%), postherpetic neuralgia in four (12%), and unclassifiable cause in one (3%). All patients received a trial of transcutaneous stimulation (Stage 1). Successful trials in 19 patients (56%) were followed by implantation of a permanent system (Stage II). Trial and postimplantation stimulation were deemed successful when there was a reduction of pain by at least 50% whenever the stimulator was on. Success rates varied from five (71%) of seven patients for central pain to five (23%) of 22 for peripheral pain and none (0%) of four for postherpetic neuralgia. The median follow-up duration in successful cases was 22.5 months. Infections occurred in seven patients, all of whom had undergone Stage II treatment. Infections were more frequent when the stimulating electrode from Stage I was left in place for Stage II (six [43%] of 14) than when completely new hardware was used and prophylactic antibiotic drugs were administered (one [20%] of five). Other complications included iatrogenic injury to the trigeminal nerve or ganglion in three cases (9%), transient diplopia in two (6%), increased pain in two (6%), and various technical problems in 10 (29%). It is concluded that pain of central origin (stroke) is the type most likely to be relieved by this procedure. This finding is new, as the few other clinical series reported to date contain no patients with this type of pain. The risk of infection seems to be lower when completely new hardware is used for Stage II and prophylactic antibiotic drugs are administered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9010419     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.2.0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain.

Authors:  Jaimie M Henderson
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2008-01

Review 2.  Uncommon areas of electrical stimulation for pain relief.

Authors:  L Lou
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Peripheral neuromodulation: a review.

Authors:  Teodor Goroszeniuk; David Pang
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-05

4.  Trigeminal neuropathy: Two case reports of gasserian ganglion stimulation.

Authors:  Yannick Logghe; Iris Smet; Ali Jerjir; Peter Verelst; Marieke Devos; Jean-Pierre Van Buyten
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Case Report: Novel Anchoring Technique and Surgical Nuances for Trigeminal Ganglion Stimulation in the Treatment of Post-Herpetic Trigeminal Neuropathic Facial Pain.

Authors:  Kunal Gupta
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-17

Review 6.  The Management of Poststroke Thalamic Pain: Update in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Songjin Ri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

7.  Neuromodulation for cephalgias.

Authors:  Serge Y Rasskazoff; Konstantin V Slavin
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-04-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.