Literature DB >> 9009939

Improving the design of muscle relaxant studies. Stabilization period and tetanic recruitment.

G C Lee1, S Iyengar, J Szenohradszky, J E Caldwell, P M Wright, R Brown, M Lau, A Luks, D M Fisher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The results from studies of muscle relaxants show wide variations among institutions. The authors hypothesized that some of this variability could be explained by differences in duration of nerve stimulation before drug administration (stabilization period).
METHODS: Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 s to both ulnar nerves and adductor pollicis twitch tension was measured in anesthetized participants given 30 micrograms/kg vecuronium. In phase 1, the stabilization period was > 30 min for both extremities. In phase 2-4, stabilization period was 20 min for one extremity and 2 min for the other. In addition, in phase 3, a 2-s 50-Hz tetanus initiated the 2-min stimulation period; in phase 4, duration of tetanus was 5 s. Twitch recovery was recorded until stable for more than 15 min. Time to 25% recovery (clinical duration) was calculated based on two indices: predrug and final (recovery) twitch tension. Values for onset and clinical duration were compared by paired parametric and nonparametric tests.
RESULTS: In phase 1, predrug and recovery twitch tension were similar in each extremity, and onset and clinical duration did not differ between extremities, permitting paired comparisons in remaining studies. In phase 2, onset was more rapid with 20-min of prestimulation. With 20-min prestimulation, predrug and recovery twitch tension were similar; with 2-min prestimulation, recovery twitch tension exceeded predrug values. When referenced to predrug twitch tension, clinical duration was shorter with 2-min, that with 20-min prestimulation. Initiating stimulation with 2-s or 5-s 50-Hz tetani (phases 3, 4) abolished differences between extremities in onset and recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: With only train-of-four stimulation (no tetani), onset and clinical duration vary with duration of prestimulation, suggesting that a brief period of predrug stimulation is inadequate. However, lengthy prestimulation may be impractical in clinical studies. Tetanic stimulation for 2 or 5 s obviates the need for prolonged stabilization during studies of muscle relaxants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9009939     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199701000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

1.  Stabilization and stability of twitch force during mechanomyography of the adductor pollicis muscle.

Authors:  G van Santen; V Fidler; J M Wierda
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Positive and negative staircase effect during single twitch and train-of-four stimulation: a laboratory study in dogs.

Authors:  Manuel Martin-Flores; Chia T Tseng; Daniel M Sakai; Marta Romano; Luis Campoy; Robin D Gleed
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Improving pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models of muscle relaxants using potentiation modelling.

Authors:  Douglas J Eleveld; Johannes H Proost; Ann De Haes; J Mark K H Wierda
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Twitch potentiation influences the time course of twitch depression in muscle relaxant studies: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic explanation.

Authors:  Douglas J Eleveld; Johannes H Proost; J Mark K H Wierda
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rapacuronium bromide.

Authors:  William J Wight; Peter M C Wright
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Influence of tetanic stimulation on the staircase phenomenon and the acceleromyographic time-course of neuromuscular block: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Guido Mazzinari; Carlos L Errando; Oscar Díaz-Cambronero; Manuel Martin-Flores
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Relationship between the muscle relaxation effect and body muscle mass measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis: A nonrandomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoon-Ji Choi; Yun Hee Kim; Go Eun Bae; Joon Ho Yu; Seung Zhoo Yoon; Hee Won Kang; Kuen Su Lee; Jae-Hwan Kim; Yoon-Sook Lee
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 1.671

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.