Literature DB >> 9009129

Determinants of lactose digestion in the miniature pig.

C A Redel1, R J Shulman, D R Tivey.   

Abstract

Although lactose is an important nutrient in the diet of the infant and child, the factors contributing to its digestion have not been clarified adequately. We sought to determine the degree to which lactase activity and small intestinal transit explain lactose digestion, the average error (SEE) in estimating lactose digestion using these parameters, and the effect of age. We compared lactose digestion from both a 7% lactose-containing formula and a solution by determining lactose in ileostomy output in pig littermates at 10 days, 4 weeks, and 10 weeks of age. The entire small intestinal mucosa was assayed for lactase specific activity (micromol x min-1 x g protein-1), total activity (micromol x min-1), and whole-villus lactase activity. Transit time (min), and transit rate (cm/min) were measured. Meal type did not affect lactose digestion. Lactose digestion was explained best by lactase specific activity (formula, R2 = 0.73, SEE = 1.1; solution, R2 = 0.69, SEE = 1.0; P < 0.001). The next best parameter was total transit rate (formula, R2 = 0.69, SEE = 2.0; solution, R2 = 0.46, SEE = 1.3). The relationship with lactase specific activity was age related and there appeared to be a critical value of lactase specific activity above which essentially all the lactose was digested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9009129     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018853625582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  26 in total

1.  THE DIGESTION AND ABSORPTION OF LACTOSE BY THE INTACT RAT.

Authors:  A DAHLQVIST; D L THOMSON
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1964 May-Jun

2.  Various carbohydrates in a semipurified diet for the growing pig.

Authors:  D E BECKER; S W TERRILL
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 4.013

3.  The fraction of dietary lactose available for fermentation in the cecum and colon of pigs.

Authors:  K I Kim; D E Jewell; N J Benevenga; R H Grummer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Lactose digestion by human jejunal biopsies: the relationship between hydrolysis and absorption.

Authors:  D J Dawson; R W Lobley; P C Burrows; V Miller; R Holmes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  A racial difference in incidence of lactase deficiency. A survey of milk intolerance and lactase deficiency in healthy adult males.

Authors:  T M Bayless; N S Rosensweig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1966-09-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effect of lactose or its component sugars on jejunal calcium absorption in adult man.

Authors:  S A Schuette; J B Knowles; H E Ford
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Effect of carbohydrates on calcium absorption in premature infants.

Authors:  T H Stathos; R J Shulman; R J Schanler; S A Abrams
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Effect of different total parenteral nutrition fuel mixes on small intestinal growth and differentiation in the infant miniature pig.

Authors:  R J Shulman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid.

Authors:  P K Smith; R I Krohn; G T Hermanson; A K Mallia; F H Gartner; M D Provenzano; E K Fujimoto; N M Goeke; B J Olson; D C Klenk
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.365

10.  Estimation of the fraction of the lactose in a high lactose diet available for fermentation in the cecum and colon of the rat.

Authors:  K I Kim; N J Benevenga; R H Grummer
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.798

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Role of milk carbohydrates in intestinal health of nursery pigs: a review.

Authors:  Ki Beom Jang; Sung Woo Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.