Literature DB >> 9008860

CSs and USs: what's the difference?

L M Gunther1, R R Miller, H Matute.   

Abstract

Differences in processing representations of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli (CSs and USs) may result from either their temporal order in training (i.e., CSs precede USs) or the greater biological significance of USs. The CS- and US-preexposure effects were used to probe this question. These effects are similar except that context extinction between preexposure and training more readily attenuates the US- than the CS-preexposure effect. In Experiments 1, 2, and 5, context extinction following preexposure to the stimulus that later served as Event 1 in Event 1-->Event 2 pairings alleviated the response deficit due to Event 1 preexposure if Event 1 was biologically significant. In Experiments 3 and 4, context extinction alleviated the response deficit due to Event 2 preexposure if Event 2 was biologically significant. Thus, biological significance and not temporal order determines how a representation will be processed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9008860     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.1.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  7 in total

Review 1.  The S-R information stream: where's the filter?

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

Review 2.  The role of US signal value in contingency, drug conditioning, and learned helplessness.

Authors:  M J Goddard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

3.  Obesity: outwitting the wisdom of the body?

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Terry L Davidson
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Animal models of fear relapse.

Authors:  Travis D Goode; Stephen Maren
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2014

5.  Conditioning-specific reflex modification of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response is sensitive to context.

Authors:  Bernard G Schreurs; Jimena Gonzalez-Joekes; Carrie A Smith-Bell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 6.  Eyeblink classical conditioning and post-traumatic stress disorder - a model systems approach.

Authors:  Bernard G Schreurs; Lauren B Burhans
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Relapse of extinguished fear after exposure to a dangerous context is mitigated by testing in a safe context.

Authors:  Travis D Goode; Janice J Kim; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.460

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.