Literature DB >> 9007976

Studies of protein-protein interfaces: a statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect.

C J Tsai1, S L Lin, H J Wolfson, R Nussinov.   

Abstract

Data sets of 362 structurally nonredundant protein-protein interfaces and of 57 symmetry-related oligomeric interfaces have been used to explore whether the hydrophobic effect that guides protein folding is also the main driving force for protein-protein associations. The buried nonpolar surface area has been used to measure the hydrophobic effect. Our analysis indicates that, although the hydrophobic effect plays a dominant role in protein-protein binding, it is not as strong as that observed in the interior of protein monomers. Comparison of interiors of the monomers with those of the interfaces reveals that, in general, the hydrophobic amino acids are more frequent in the interior of the monomers than in the interior of the protein-protein interfaces. On the other hand, a higher proportion of charged and polar residues are buried at the interfaces, suggesting that hydrogen bonds and ion pairs contribute more to the stability of protein binding than to that of protein folding. Moreover, comparison of the interior of the interfaces to protein surfaces indicates that the interfaces are poorer in polar/charged than the surfaces and are richer in hydrophobic residues. The interior of the interfaces appears to constitute a compromise between the stabilization contributed by the hydrophobic effect on the one hand and avoiding patches on the protein surfaces that are too hydrophobic on the other. Such patches would be unfavorable for the unassociated monomers in solution. We conclude that, although the types of interactions are similar between protein-protein interfaces and single-chain proteins overall, the contribution of the hydrophobic effect to protein-protein associations is not as strong as to protein folding. This implies that packing patterns and interatom, or interresidue, pairwise potential functions, derived from monomers, are not ideally suited to predicting and assessing ligand associations or design. These would perform adequately only in cases where the hydrophobic effect at the binding site is substantial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9007976      PMCID: PMC2143524          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560060106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  17 in total

1.  New algorithm to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity. Applications to antibody-antigen docking.

Authors:  P H Walls; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Dominant forces in protein folding.

Authors:  K A Dill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-08-07       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Protein-protein interaction at crystal contacts.

Authors:  J Janin; F Rodier
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-12

4.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.

Authors:  F C Bernstein; T F Koetzle; G J Williams; E F Meyer; M D Brice; J R Rodgers; O Kennard; T Shimanouchi; M Tasumi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Why do globular proteins fit the limited set of folding patterns?

Authors:  A V Finkelstein; O B Ptitsyn
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins.

Authors:  J L Cornette; K B Cease; H Margalit; J L Spouge; J A Berzofsky; C DeLisi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility.

Authors:  B Lee; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1971-02-14       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Biological meaning, statistical significance, and classification of local spatial similarities in nonhomologous proteins.

Authors:  N N Alexandrov; N Go
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition.

Authors:  L Young; R L Jernigan; D G Covell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Estimation of surface hydrophobicity of proteins by partitioning.

Authors:  V P Shanbhag
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.600

View more
  131 in total

Review 1.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function.

Authors:  C J Tsai; S Kumar; B Ma; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Chemical characteristics of dimer interfaces in the legume lectin family.

Authors:  S Elgavish; B Shaanan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Distinguishing between sequential and nonsequentially folded proteins: implications for folding and misfolding.

Authors:  C J Tsai; J V Maizel; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Hydrophobic hydration of amphipathic peptides.

Authors:  Y K Cheng; W S Sheu; P J Rossky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Structural and evolutionary relationships among protein tyrosine phosphatase domains.

Authors:  J N Andersen; O H Mortensen; G H Peters; P G Drake; L F Iversen; O H Olsen; P G Jansen; H S Andersen; N K Tonks; N P Møller
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Mapping the lethal factor and edema factor binding sites on oligomeric anthrax protective antigen.

Authors:  Kristina Cunningham; D Borden Lacy; Jeremy Mogridge; R John Collier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  'Fixed charge' chemical derivatization and data dependant multistage tandem mass spectrometry for mapping protein surface residue accessibility.

Authors:  Xiao Zhou; Yali Lu; Wenjing Wang; Babak Borhan; Gavin E Reid
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Identification of Lynch syndrome mutations in the MLH1-PMS2 interface that disturb dimerization and mismatch repair.

Authors:  Jan Kosinski; Inga Hinrichsen; Janusz M Bujnicki; Peter Friedhoff; Guido Plotz
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface?

Authors:  Daniel R Caffrey; Shyamal Somaroo; Jason D Hughes; Julian Mintseris; Enoch S Huang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Identifying binding hot spots on protein surfaces by mixed-solvent molecular dynamics: HIV-1 protease as a test case.

Authors:  Peter M U Ung; Phani Ghanakota; Sarah E Graham; Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.