| Literature DB >> 9007640 |
C H Brenner1, R Fimmers, M P Baur.
Abstract
Suppose that part of the prosecution's evidence in some crime case is analysis of a blood stain, and that the traits E discovered in the stain suggest multiple donors. Then the prosecution will probably allege some specific inculpatory hypothesis H0 about the sources of the stain, and P (E [symbol: see text] H0) can be calculated. It is desirable to use this as the numerator of a likelihood ratio. However, in general the obvious denominator P (E [symbol: see text] approximately H0) cannot be calculated, so unless the defense is sufficiently obliging as to stipulate to a specific choice among the potentially infinite number of more or less exculpatory alternative hypotheses, the desired likelihood ratio can't be evaluated. We show that nonetheless, in most cases there is an adequate inequality.Mesh:
Year: 1996 PMID: 9007640 DOI: 10.1007/bf01225523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Legal Med ISSN: 0937-9827 Impact factor: 2.686