Literature DB >> 9007569

Excitatory and inhibitory response adaptation in the superior olive complex affects binaural acoustic processing.

P G Finlayson1, T J Adam.   

Abstract

Short-term adaptation was examined in single unit recordings from 113 superior olive neurons of anaesthetized 3- to 6-month-old Long-Evans rats. Responses to an equal intensity BF probe tone presented 1 ms after an 'adapting' BF tone were adapted by 56.3 +/- 2.6% (mean +/- S.E.) compared to responses at a 512 ms delay. The rapid decrease in discharge rate during adapting tones often approximated exponential time courses with time constants of less than 20 ms. The recovery from adaptation was exponential with time constants of 106 +/- 20.0 ms. The magnitude of adaptation and time course of recovery following monaural stimulation of binaurally excited (EE) neurons were not significantly different in both input pathways. Additionally, in 60% of EE neurons, an 'adapting' tone presented to one ear reduced subsequent responses to probe tones presented to the opposite ear. Binaural stimulation resulted in equal or greater adaptation of responses than monaural stimulation of either ear. The recovery of binaural excitatory responses generally followed a time course between recovery functions for ipsilateral and contralateral monaural stimuli. Lateral Superior Olive (LSO) neurons encode sound source location through the interaction of ipsilateral excitation and contralateral inhibition (IE). Ipsilaterally driven excitatory responses in LSO neurons exhibited the greatest magnitude of adaptation (68.5 +/- 21.1%). Adaptation of inhibition was observed in over half of IE neurons. Responses of LSO neurons to binaural BF probe stimuli were greatest immediately after a 200 ms BF 'inhibitory adapting' stimulus to the contralateral ear, and decreased with greater interstimulus delays. Responses to binaural stimulation were constant after prior binaural adaptation, when the magnitude and recovery of adaptation to monaural stimuli were similar for excitation and inhibition (8/25 IE cells). The functional significance and possible sites of adaptation processes are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9007569     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00158-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  14 in total

1.  Transformations of an auditory temporal code in the medulla of a sound-producing fish.

Authors:  J Kozloski; J D Crawford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Changes in glycine immunoreactivity in the rat superior olivary complex following deafness.

Authors:  Eric D Buras; Avril Genene Holt; Ronald D Griffith; Mikiya Asako; Richard A Altschuler
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Dynamic changes in level influence spatial coding in the lateral superior olive.

Authors:  Thomas J Park; Antje Brand; Ursula Koch; Maki Ikebuchi; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Influence of double stimulation on sound-localization behavior in barn owls.

Authors:  Lutz Kettler; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Adaptive responses of peripheral lateral line nerve fibres to sinusoidal wave stimuli.

Authors:  Joachim Mogdans; Christina Müller; Maren Frings; Ferdinand Raap
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Forward masking in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body of the rat.

Authors:  Fei Gao; Albert S Berrebi
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 7.  Processing of communication sounds: contributions of learning, memory, and experience.

Authors:  Amy Poremba; James Bigelow; Breein Rossi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The time scale of adaptation in tonal sequence processing by the mouse auditory midbrain neurons.

Authors:  E S Malinina; M A Egorova; G D Khorunzhii; A G Akimov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-08

9.  Wide-dynamic-range forward suppression in marmoset inferior colliculus neurons is generated centrally and accounts for perceptual masking.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Zachary M Smith; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Adaptation in the auditory system: an overview.

Authors:  David Pérez-González; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.