Literature DB >> 9006561

Patterns of initial management of node-negative breast cancer in two Canadian provinces. British Columbia/Ontario Working Group.

V Goel1, I Olivotto, T G Hislop, C Sawka, A Coldman, E J Holowaty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the patterns of initial management of node-negative breast cancer in Ontario and British Columbia and to compare the characteristics of the patients and tumours and of the physicians and hospitals involved in management.
DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All 942 newly diagnosed cases of node-negative breast cancer in 1991 in British Columbia and a random sample of 938 newly diagnosed cases in Ontario in the same year. OUTCOME MEASURES: Number and proportion of patients with newly diagnosed node-negative breast cancer who received breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy and who received radiation therapy after BCS.
RESULTS: BCS was used in 413 cases (43.8%) in British Columbia and in 634 cases (67.6%) in Ontario (p < 0.001). After BCS, radiation therapy was received by 378 patients (91.5% of those who had undergone BCS) in British Columbia and 479 patients (75.6% of those who had undergone BCS) in Ontario (p < 0.001). In both provinces, lower patient age, smaller tumour size, a noncentral unifocal tumour, absence of extensive ductal carcinoma in situ and initial surgery by a surgeon with an academic affiliation were associated with greater use of BCS. Lower patient age and larger tumour size were associated with greater use of radiation therapy after BCS in both provinces.
CONCLUSION: Patient, tumour and physician factors are associated with the choice of initial management of breast cancer in these two Canadian provinces. However, the differences in management between the two provinces are only partly explained by these factors. Other possible explanations, such as the presence of provincial guidelines, differences in the organization of the health care system or differences in patient preference, require further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9006561      PMCID: PMC1226853     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  15 in total

Review 1.  Social, prognostic, and therapeutic factors associated with cancer survival: a population-based study in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Eric J Holowaty; Ethan Laukkanen; Isaac N Luginaah
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2003-11

2.  Income and long-term breast cancer survival: comparisons of vulnerable urban places in Ontario and California.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Karen Y Fung; Isaac N Luginaah; Eric J Holowaty; Caroline Hamm
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Variations in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer in Quebec between 1988 and 1994.

Authors:  N Hébert-Croteau; J Brisson; J Latreille; C Blanchette; L Deschênes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-10-19       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Breast Cancer Guidelines in Canada: A Review of Development and Implementation.

Authors:  Amy Folkes; Robin Urquhart; Louise Zitzelsberger; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Breast cancer survival by teaching status of the initial treating hospital.

Authors:  R Chaudhry; V Goel; C Sawka
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol A. Sawka; Vivek Goel; Catherine A. Mahut; Glen A. Taylor; Elaine C. Thiel; Annette M. O'Connor; Ida Ackerman; Janet H. Burt; Elaine H. Gort
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  An international comparison of breast cancer survival: Winnipeg, Manitoba and Des Moines, Iowa, metropolitan areas.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Erich Kliewer; Eric J Holowaty; Ethan Laukkanen; Edwin Y Ng
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Responses by breast and prostate cancer patients to out-of-pocket costs in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Authors:  E Housser; M Mathews; J Lemessurier; S Young; J Hawboldt; R West
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  A consultation with Canadian rural women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross E Gray; Pamela James; Jackie Manthorne; Judy Gould; Margaret I Fitch
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Perceptions of health care providers concerning patient and health care provider strategies to limit out-of-pocket costs for cancer care.

Authors:  M Mathews; S Buehler; R West
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.