Literature DB >> 9006478

The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 2: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

D C Hadorn1, A C Holmes.   

Abstract

Priority criteria developed during a national project were used to conduct an audit of all 662 patients on waiting lists for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand during spring 1996. Based on the observed distribution of priority scores, the cost of providing surgery to all patients down to various levels of priority was estimated. Descriptions incorporating life expectancy and quality of life implications of surgery were developed of the kinds of patients who would or would not receive surgery at each of several possible funding levels. Cardiologists and cardiac surgeons agreed that a threshold of 25 points was a reasonable clinical goal but to work with a threshold of 35, which can be sustained with current levels of funding. All agree that the gap between these clinically preferred and currently afforded thresholds is a subject for wider societal dialogue and decision. The ability to measure the size of the gap between clinical desirability and financial sustainability provides a new transparency to the problem of healthcare resource allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9006478      PMCID: PMC2125624          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  23 in total

1.  Waiting for medical services in Canada: lots of heat, but little light.

Authors:  C Sanmartin; S E Shortt; M L Barer; S Sheps; S Lewis; P W McDonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Investigation and management of stable angina: revised guidelines 1998. Joint Working Party of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  D de Bono
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Equity in access to exercise tolerance testing, coronary angiography, and coronary artery bypass grafting by age, sex and clinical indications.

Authors:  A Bowling; M Bond; D McKee; M McClay; A P Banning; N Dudley; A Elder; A Martin; I Blackman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Priority setting in surgery: improve the process and share the learning.

Authors:  Douglas K Martin; Nancy Walton; Peter A Singer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The Chaoulli challenge: getting a grip on waiting lists.

Authors:  David Hadorn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Insider view of rationing down under.

Authors:  T M Agnew; M W Webster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-24

7.  Rationing and the health authority.

Authors:  T Hope; N Hicks; D J Reynolds; R Crisp; S Griffiths
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-17

8.  Urgency and priority models. Model has limited practical application.

Authors:  I M Mitchell; D W Quinn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

Review 9.  Urgency and priority for cardiac surgery: a clinical judgment analysis.

Authors:  F Kee; P McDonald; J R Kirwan; C C Patterson; A H Love
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-21

10.  Assessing the cost effectiveness of using prognostic biomarkers with decision models: case study in prioritising patients waiting for coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  Martin Henriksson; Stephen Palmer; Ruoling Chen; Jacqueline Damant; Natalie K Fitzpatrick; Keith Abrams; Aroon D Hingorani; Ulf Stenestrand; Magnus Janzon; Gene Feder; Bruce Keogh; Martin J Shipley; Juan-Carlos Kaski; Adam Timmis; Mark Sculpher; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.