Literature DB >> 9004435

Finite amplitude distortion and its relationship to linear derating formulae for diagnostic ultrasound systems.

T Christopher1, E L Carstensen.   

Abstract

Formulation of indices that can be used as predictors of biological effects of ultrasound involves a process called derating, in which measurements of the sound field made in water are extrapolated to estimates of the magnitude of the sound fields in the tissues of the body. All indices that have been formulated up to the present time assume that the propagation of ultrasound is linear. In fact, under most exposure conditions for which biological effects may be a concern, sound propagation is highly nonlinear. A nonlinear propagation model has been used in this study to evaluate the nature of the effects that occur under realistic exposure conditions encountered in diagnostic procedures. Because of the way that the thermal index is defined, it turns out that ignoring nonlinear propagation leads to underestimates of tissue temperature increments that typically are less than 40%. As currently implemented, the mechanical index may be underestimated by more than a factor of two because it ignores the saturation of the sound fields that result from nonlinear propagation. For large propagation distances in soft tissues (e.g., 10 cm at 3 MHz in liver); however, it is physically difficult to exceed tissue pressures corresponding to MI > 2 because of these same saturation phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9004435     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(96)00099-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  7 in total

1.  A DERATING METHOD FOR THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND.

Authors:  O V Bessonova; V A Khokhlova; M S Canney; M R Bailey; L A Crum
Journal:  Acoust Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 0.856

2.  A model for estimating ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path to the fetus from backscattered waveforms.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Shock formation and nonlinear saturation effects in the ultrasound field of a diagnostic curvilinear probe.

Authors:  Maria M Karzova; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Vera A Khokhlova; Bryan W Cunitz; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Investigation of ultrasound image processing to improve perceptibility of microcalcifications.

Authors:  Naohisa Kamiyama; Yoko Okamura; Akihiro Kakee; Hideyuki Hashimoto
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  A theoretical study of inertial cavitation from acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and implications for the mechanical index.

Authors:  Charles C Church; Cecille Labuda; Kathryn Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  FOCUSING OF HIGH POWER ULTRASOUND BEAMS AND LIMITING VALUES OF SHOCK WAVE PARAMETERS.

Authors:  O V Bessonova; V A Khokhlova; M R Bailey; M S Canney; L A Crum
Journal:  Acoust Phys       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 0.856

7.  Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: a combined measurement and modeling approach.

Authors:  Michael S Canney; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum; Vera A Khokhlova; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.