Literature DB >> 9004120

Movements of vertebrae during manipulative thrusts to unembalmed human cadavers.

J Gál1, W Herzog, G Kawchuk, P J Conway, Y T Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure the relative movements of vertebrae during manipulative thrusts to unembalmed post-rigor mortis human cadavers.
SETTING: The investigation was conducted in the gross anatomy laboratory at the University of Calgary.
SUBJECTS: Two 77-yr-old, unembalmed, post-rigor mortis, male cadavers were used.
INTERVENTIONS: The movements of vertebrae were investigated by using high-speed cinematography to record the movements of bone pins threaded into T10, T11 and T12 during spinal manipulative therapy to unembalmed post-rigor human cadavers. A single clinician delivered a series of posterior-to-anterior (p-to-a) thrusts to the right transverse process of either T10, T11 or T12, using a reinforced hypothenar contact. Relative p-to-a and lateral translations, as well as axial and sagittal rotations, in T10-T11 and T11-T12 were calculated. Corresponding p-to-a forces exerted by the clinician onto the cadaver were recorded using a pressure pad. MAIN
RESULTS: Significant relative movements were measured primarily between the targeted and immediately adjacent vertebrae during the thrusts. Vertebral pairs remained slightly 'hyper-extended' after the rapid thrusts to T11, when the p-to-a forces returned to preload levels.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings may be useful for the understanding of the deformation behavior of the vertebral column during therapeutic manipulation. A fully three-dimensional analysis of all six degrees of freedom, using a larger number of unembalmed cadavers, would be useful in clarifying the relationship between the externally applied forces and the observed relative movement patterns of the vertebrae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9004120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  24 in total

1.  Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Michael A K Liebschner; Joshua W Little; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Response of lumbar paraspinal muscles spindles is greater to spinal manipulative loading compared with slower loading under length control.

Authors:  Joel G Pickar; Paul S Sung; Yu-Ming Kang; Weiqing Ge
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  A randomized sham-controlled trial of a neurodynamic technique in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Don D Price; Michael E Robinson; Kevin R Vincent; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Effect of chiropractic treatment on hip extension ability and running velocity among young male running athletes.

Authors:  Jörgen Sandell; Per J Palmgren; Lars Björndahl
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2008-06

5.  Validation of a sham comparator for thoracic spinal manipulation in patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Joseph R Kardouni; Catarina O Sousa; Jacqueline M Ely
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-09-06

6.  Validation of the cat as a model for the human lumbar spine during simulated high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Joel G Pickar; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  The effect of spinal manipulation impulse duration on spine neuromechanical responses.

Authors:  Isabelle Pagé; François Nougarou; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

Review 8.  Spinal manipulative therapy and somatosensory activation.

Authors:  J G Pickar; P S Bolton
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 2.368

9.  A preliminary study comparing the use of cervical/upper thoracic mobilization and manipulation for individuals with mechanical neck pain.

Authors:  David Griswold; Ken Learman; Bryan O'Halloran; Josh Cleland
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-05

10.  Comparison of human lumbar facet joint capsule strains during simulated high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation versus physiological motions.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.