Literature DB >> 9002385

Choice of response scale for health measurement: comparison of 4, 5, and 7-point scales and visual analog scale.

C Nagata1, M Ido, H Shimizu, A Misao, H Matsuura.   

Abstract

To compare the feasibility of response scales with different numbers of steps for measuring health status, we assessed the ease of completing 4, 5, and 7-point scales and a visual analog scale. Four forms of the questionnaire, each of which consisted of the same ten questions about health status, but with a different type of scale among the four above mentioned, were given to 48 patients with a variety of conditions and diagnoses. The forms were attached together and the order in which they were presented was systematically varied considering permutations of forms. Respondents were asked to complete the forms following the order of the sheets. The 5-point scale form was most commonly chosen as the easiest to complete, and item omission was least frequent with this form. Similar high- reliability results in terms of Cronbach's alpha were achieved for each of the four forms. An additional survey among 153 patients confirmed the results of the first survey. The selection of the easiest scale to complete varied by sex (men preferred the 7-point scale), but was not affected by the conditions or diagnoses of the patients. The study suggests that the 5-point scale is most useful for measuring health status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9002385     DOI: 10.2188/jea.6.192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0917-5040            Impact factor:   3.211


  6 in total

1.  An enhanced functional ability questionnaire (faVIQ) to measure the impact of rehabilitation services on the visually impaired.

Authors:  James Stuart Wolffsohn; Jonathan Jackson; Olivia Anne Hunt; Charles Cottriall; Jennifer Lindsay; Richard Gilmour; Anne Sinclair; Robert Harper
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  The quality of life questionnaire for cancer patients treated with anticancer drugs (QOL-ACD): validity and reliability in japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  T Matsumoto; Y Ohashi; S Morita; K Kobayashi; M Shibuya; Y Yamaji; K Eguchi; M Fukuoka; K Nagao; Y Nishiwaki; H Niitani
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Association between perception of dentist oversupply and expectations of dentistry: a survey of dental graduates in Japan.

Authors:  Takeshi Watanabe; Takashi Hanioka; Mito Yamamoto; Satoru Haresaku; Kaoru Shimada; Toru Naito
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.607

4.  The PU-PROM: A patient-reported outcome measure for peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Na Liu; Jing Lv; Jinchun Liu; Yanbo Zhang
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Effect of the Abdominal Draw-In Maneuver and Bracing on Abdominal Muscle Thickness and the Associated Subjective Difficulty in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Sachiko Madokoro; Masami Yokogawa; Hiroichi Miaki
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-19

6.  A randomised comparison of a four- and a five-point scale version of the Norwegian Function Assessment Scale.

Authors:  Nina Østerås; Pål Gulbrandsen; Andrew Garratt; Jūratë Saltytë Benth; Fredrik A Dahl; Bård Natvig; Søren Brage
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.186

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.