Literature DB >> 9000391

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections.

O Dicle1, C Küçükler, T Pirnar, Y Erata, C Posaci.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the healing period of incision scar in myometrial wall and the normal pelvis after cesarean sections by means of MRI. In this study 17 voluntary women were examined after their first delivery with cesarean section in the early postpartum period (first 5 days), and following this, three more times in 3-month intervals. The MRI examinations were performed on a 1.0-T system (Magnetom, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), and sagittal T1-weighted (550/17 TR/TE) and T2-weighted (2000/80 TR/TE) spin-echo (SE) images of the pelvis were obtained. During follow-up examinations incision scar tissues lost their signals within the first 3 months on both SE sequences, and little alteration was observed in the subsequent tests. Zonal anatomy of the uterus reappeared completely 6 months after cesarean sections. The time for the involution of the uterus was independent of the zonal anatomy recovery, and the maximum involution was inspected within the first 3 months. In conclusion, the maturation time of myometrial scar tissue in uncomplicated cesarean sections, which can be evaluated by the signal alterations in MRI, is approximately 3 months, whereas the complete involution and the recovery of the zonal anatomy need at least 6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9000391     DOI: 10.1007/s003300050103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  8 in total

Review 1.  Robotic repair of uterine dehiscence.

Authors:  Mauricio Francisco La Rosa; Shirley McCarthy; Christine Richter; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Zarko Alfirevic; Patsy Spark; Peter Brocklehurst; Marian Knight
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Laparoscopic correction of the uterine muscle loss in the scar after a Caesarean section delivery.

Authors:  Michał Ciebiera; Grzegorz Jakiel; Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Uterine Scar Niche before and after Laparoscopic Surgical Repair: A Case Report.

Authors:  Olivier Drouin; Tessa Bergeron; Ariane Beaudry; Suzanne Demers; Stéphanie Roberge; Emmanuel Bujold
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2014-05-28

5.  Laparoscopic isthmocele treatment - single center experience.

Authors:  Michał Ciebiera; Magdalena Ciebiera; Magdalena Czekańska-Rawska; Grzegorz Jakiel
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  Nationwide population-based cohort study of adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnancies with myoma or following myomectomy: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Se Jin Lee; Hyun Sun Ko; Sunghun Na; Jin Young Bae; Won Joon Seong; Jong Woon Kim; Jaeeun Shin; Hae Joong Cho; Gyu Yeon Choi; Jinsil Kim; Geum Joon Cho; In Yang Park
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Comparative accuracy of magnetic resonance morphometry and sonography in assessment of post-cesarean uterine scar.

Authors:  Gayatri Satpathy; Ishan Kumar; Manjari Matah; Ashish Verma
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

8.  Is there an optimal inter-delivery interval in women who underwent trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC)?

Authors:  Jiaming Rao; Dazhi Fan; Huiting Ma; Dongxin Lin; Huishan Zhang; Zixing Zhou; Pengsheng Li; Gengdong Chen; Demei Lu; Yan Liu; Zhaoxia Wu; Jieyun He; Xinjuan Liu; BingJie Peng; Xiaoling Guo; Zhengping Liu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.