Literature DB >> 8999803

Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United States

.   

Abstract

Geographic distribution data for endangered species in the United States were used to locate "hot spots" of threatened biodiversity. The hot spots for different species groups rarely overlap, except where anthropogenic activities reduce natural habitat in centers of endemism. Conserving endangered plant species maximizes the incidental protection of all other species groups. The presence of endangered birds and herptiles, however, provides a more sensitive indication of overall endangered biodiversity within any region. The amount of land that needs to be managed to protect currently endangered and threatened species in the United States is a relatively small proportion of the land mass.

Year:  1997        PMID: 8999803     DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5299.550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  36 in total

1.  Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy.

Authors:  B Reyers; A S van Jaarsveld; M Krüger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes?

Authors:  S J Andelman; W F Fagan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hot spots, indicator taxa, complementarity and optimal networks of taiga.

Authors:  K M Virolainen; P Ahlroth; E Hyvärinen; E Korkeamäki; J Mattila; J Päiivinen; T Rintala; T Suomi; J Suhonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Extinction rates under nonrandom patterns of habitat loss.

Authors:  Eric W Seabloom; Andy P Dobson; David M Stoms
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Phaeosphaeride A, an inhibitor of STAT3-dependent signaling isolated from an endophytic fungus.

Authors:  Katherine N Maloney; Wenshan Hao; Jun Xu; Jay Gibbons; John Hucul; Deborah Roll; Sean F Brady; Frank C Schroeder; Jon Clardy
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 6.005

6.  Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Paul R Armsworth; Gretchen C Daily; Peter Kareiva; James N Sanchirico
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Transaction costs economics of irreplaceability: ex ante and ex post evaluation of conservation networks' vulnerability to environmental shocks.

Authors:  Henrik Huusom; Niels Strange
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Global associations between terrestrial producer and vertebrate consumer diversity.

Authors:  Walter Jetz; Holger Kreft; Gerardo Ceballos; Jens Mutke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Delayed phenological timing of dragonfly emergence in Japan over five decades.

Authors:  Hideyuki Doi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Latent extinction risk and the future battlegrounds of mammal conservation.

Authors:  Marcel Cardillo; Georgina M Mace; John L Gittleman; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.