Literature DB >> 8998902

Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Miami.

J W Uribe1, K S Hechtman, J E Zvijac, E W Tjin-A-Tsoi.   

Abstract

Failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as defined by recurrent patholaxity is increasingly commonplace. This report presents the findings of 54 patients who had unsuccessful intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to correct persistent instability and who subsequently underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Before revision, patients were evaluated by clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer, radiographs, Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, and subjective questionnaire. The results were compared at a mean of 32 months following revision surgery. There was an average of 16 months from index procedure to the time of revision. Autogenous patellar tendon grafts were used in 61% of the cases with 30% of these harvested from the contralateral knee. Fresh frozen patellar tendon was used in 35% and autogenous hamstring tendons in 4%. Revision was successful in objectively improving stability in all patients with an average KT-000 of 2.8 mm. Autogenous tissue grafts provided greater objective stability when compared with allograft tissue with average KT-1000 of 2.2 and 3.3, respectively. Functionally, however, there was no significant difference in outcome between the 2 groups. Harvesting of the contralateral patellar tendon was found to have no adverse long term effect. Subjectively, the results were significantly worse depending on the degree of articular cartilage degeneration. Only 54% of patients returned to their preanterior cruciate ligament injury activity level. Competence in various anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques will facilitate revision surgery especially in avoiding preexisting tunnels and hardware. Correct graft placement and addressing the secondary restraints are critical to successful revision surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8998902     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199604000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Pedro Debieux; Biju Benjamin; Sébastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Revision ACL reconstruction: influence of a lateral tenodesis.

Authors:  Christophe Trojani; Philippe Beaufils; Gilles Burdin; Christophe Bussière; Vincent Chassaing; Patrick Djian; Frédéric Dubrana; François-Paul Ehkirch; Jean-Pierre Franceschi; Christophe Hulet; Franck Jouve; Jean-François Potel; Abderahmane Sbihi; Philippe Neyret; Philippe Colombet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Over-the-top double-bundle revision ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Maurilio Marcacci; Stefano Zaffagnini; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision.

Authors:  Christophe Trojani; Abderahmane Sbihi; Patrick Djian; Jean-François Potel; Christophe Hulet; Frank Jouve; Christophe Bussière; François-Paul Ehkirch; Gilles Burdin; Frédéric Dubrana; Philippe Beaufils; Jean-Pierre Franceschi; Vincent Chassaing; Philippe Colombet; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Alejandro I Marcano; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Ramon Cugat; Kevin W Farmer; Michael W Moser
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-10

6.  Patient demographics and surgical characteristics in ACL revision: a comparison of French, Norwegian, and North American cohorts.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Christophe Trojani; Lars-Petter Granan; Philippe Neyret; Philippe Colombet; Lars Engebretsen; Rick W Wright; Christopher C Kaeding
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [Allografts for cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  S Buchmann; V Musahl; A B Imhoff; P U Brucker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Radiographic Anatomy of the Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaron P Sullivan; Shane Cook; Yubo Gao; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-12-02

10.  Femoral tunnel malposition in ACL revision reconstruction.

Authors:  Joseph A Morgan; Diane Dahm; Bruce Levy; Michael J Stuart
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.