Literature DB >> 8998863

Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Germany.

C J Wirth1, D Kohn.   

Abstract

From 1976 to 1992, reconstruction after failed anterior cruciate ligament repair or reconstruction was done for 87 patients (8%) compared with 1064 primary operations at the authors' institution. Fifty-seven patients had 1 previous reconstruction, 27 patients had 2, and 3 patients had 3 or more previous reconstructions. Fifty-two patients (60%) were satisfied with their results after a mean followup time of 8 years (range, 2-18 years). Lysholm scores after revisions (68 +/- 12) were significantly inferior compared with scores after primary anterior cruciate ligament surgery (83 +/- 14). The authors favor the use of the patellar tendon or quadriceps tendon autograft in revision surgery. Medial meniscus reconstruction is done whenever possible, or the medial meniscus is replaced by autograft tissue. Open or arthroscopic techniques are used, depending on the individual case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8998863     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199604000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

Review 1.  Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Alejandro I Marcano; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Ramon Cugat; Kevin W Farmer; Michael W Moser
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Revision ACL reconstruction in skeletally mature athletes younger than 18 years.

Authors:  Keith R Reinhardt; Sommer Hammoud; Andrea L Bowers; Ben-Paul Umunna; Frank A Cordasco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Corey S Gill; Ling Chen; Robert H Brophy; Matthew J Matava; Matthew V Smith; Nathan A Mall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Jon Olav Drogset; Annja Viset; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Grete Sofie Hortemo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The effect of graft strength on knee laxity and graft in-situ forces after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yu-Shu Lai; Wen-Chuan Chen; Chang-Hung Huang; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Kam-Kong Chan; Ting-Kuo Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great.

Authors:  Ian D Engler; Matthew J Salzler; Andrew J Wall; William R Johnson; Amun Makani; Margaret V Shields; Thomas J Gill
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-09-02

8.  Avoiding Complications and Technical Variability During Arthroscopically Assisted Transtibial ACL Reconstructions by Using a C-Arm With Image Intensifier.

Authors:  Natasha Trentacosta; Allison Liefeld Fillar; Cynthia Pierce Liefeld; Michael D Hossack; I Martin Levy
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-25

9.  Magnesium inference screw supports early graft incorporation with inhibition of graft degradation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pengfei Cheng; Pei Han; Changli Zhao; Shaoxiang Zhang; Xiaonong Zhang; Yimin Chai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.