Literature DB >> 8998087

Cost-effectiveness of mandatory stress testing in chest pain center patients.

M G Mikhail1, F A Smith, M Gray, C Britton, S M Frederiksen.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether emergency patients with acute chest pain and low suspicion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be managed cost-effectively and safely in a dedicated chest pain center (CPC) that incorporates mandatory stress testing.
METHODS: We assembled a prospective observational case series of consecutive adult patients transferred from the emergency department to a nine-bed, 23-hour CPC in a 564-bed community hospital from January 13 through May 31, 1994. In our institution, all emergency patients with acute nontraumatic chest pain of unclear origin, suggestive of myocardial ischemia but with a low probability of AMI, are transferred to the CPC for further evaluation. All patients in whom AMI is ruled out undergo individually appropriate cardiac diagnostic testing in accordance with CPC clinical guidelines. Patients with end-stage coronary artery disease transferred to the CPC for a "rule-out" protocol only did not undergo further diagnostic testing. Admitted and discharged patients were followed through chart review and telephone survey, respectively.
RESULTS: Of the 502 patients transferred to the CPC, 477 (95%) completed follow-up at 14 days. Four hundred ten (86%) were discharged home. Those discharged after diagnostic evaluation yielded negative findings had 100% survival and zero diagnosis of AMI at 5-month follow-up. Overall mortality and incidence of AMI on long-term follow-up for all patients transferred to the CPC were .4% and .2%, respectively. Sixty-seven patients (13%) were admitted from the CPC, of whom 44 (66%) had a final diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD) or AMI. Twenty-four patients with IHD (55%; 6% of stress-tested group) were identified only on further stress testing. Of these patients, seven underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting during hospitalization. All were discharged home without major morbidity. Four hundred twenty-four patients (84%) underwent stress testing. The cost of mandatory stress testing to identify one patient with IHD after AMI was ruled out was $3,125. An average cost-per-case savings of 62% was achieved for each patient transferred to the CPC who would have been hospitalized before the inception of the CPC.
CONCLUSION: Mandatory stress testing is a safe, cost-effective, and valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in CPC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8998087     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70314-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  16 in total

1.  Chest pain evaluation units

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Routine invasive versus conservative management strategies in acute coronary syndrome: time for a "hybrid" approach.

Authors:  Pravin Pratap; Sameer Gupta; Michael Berlowitz; Michael Berlowtiz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Emergency department chest pain units and the role of radionuclide imaging.

Authors:  B G Abbott; F J Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Accident and emergency medicine.

Authors:  S A Stahmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-04

5.  Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost saving in a British hospital?

Authors:  S Goodacre; F Morris; J Arnold; K Angelini
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Emergency department visits: the cost of trauma centers.

Authors:  Kyung Hye Kim; Kathleen Carey; James F Burgess
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2009-09

7.  Management strategies for patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Maame Yaa A B Yiadom; Joshua M Kosowsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-02

8.  ROMEO: a rapid rule out strategy for low risk chest pain. Does it work in a UK emergency department?

Authors:  C Taylor; A Forrest-Hay; S Meek
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Hospital variation in the use of noninvasive cardiac imaging and its association with downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes.

Authors:  Kyan C Safavi; Shu-Xia Li; Kumar Dharmarajan; Arjun K Venkatesh; Kelly M Strait; Haiqun Lin; Timothy J Lowe; Reza Fazel; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort.

Authors:  Jim Christenson; Grant Innes; Douglas McKnight; Barb Boychuk; Eric Grafstein; Christopher R Thompson; Frances Rosenberg; Aslam H Anis; Ken Gin; Jessica Tilley; Hubert Wong; Joel Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.