Literature DB >> 8997925

The structure of an instrument for assessing the effects of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis.

U Nordenskiöld1, G Grimby, M Hedberg, B Wright, J M Linacre.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use Rasch analysis to transform the ordinal score from a newly developed instrument, the Evaluation of Daily Activities Questionnaire (EDAQ), in order to obtain unidimensional linear measures; to analyze whether items change in difficulty with interventions; and to follow changes in subjects' degree of ability.
METHODS: Twenty-one women with rheumatoid arthritis rated their perceived difficulty without and with assistive devices or altered working methods using the EDAQ; the EDAQ consists of 102 items of daily activities, divided into 11 dimensions.
RESULTS: All items in the EDAQ could be structured into an acceptable model from "hard" to "easy" with the subjects overall measures ranging from "more able" to "less able." Forty-one items showed a significant reduction of difficulty with interventions. For some items results indicated that easier initial difficulty led to greater effect of interventions. In general, difficulty without assistive devices could not predict difficulty with interventions. Twenty women demonstrated a significant increase in activities of daily living (ADL) ability after interventions.
CONCLUSION: The EDAQ analyzed with the Rasch model, demonstrated a hierarchical order of difficulty in 102 items showing that it was possible to evaluate the effect of using assistive devices or altered working methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8997925     DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199610)9:5<358::aid-anr1790090504>3.0.co;2-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res        ISSN: 0893-7524


  5 in total

1.  Assistive devices: integral to the daily lives of human beings.

Authors:  M A van Kuyk-Minis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Questionnaire to evaluate the effects of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  U Nordenskiöld; G Grimby; S Dahlin-Ivanoff
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia.

Authors:  F Wolfe; S X Kong
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  The reliability and validity of the English version of the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire for people with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alison Hammond; Alan Tennant; Sarah F Tyson; Ulla Nordenskiöld; Ruth Hawkins; Yeliz Prior
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Linguistic validation and cultural adaptation of an English version of the evaluation of daily activity questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alison Hammond; Sarah Tyson; Yeliz Prior; Ruth Hawkins; Alan Tennant; Ulla Nordenskiold; Ingrid Thyberg; Gunnel Sandqvist; Ragnhild Cederlund
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.186

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.