Literature DB >> 8997779

Assessment issues and domains in the prediction of relapse.

D M Donovan1.   

Abstract

The present paper provides a brief overview of methodological issues involved in the process of assessment related to the classification and prediction of relapse. These include conceptual and operational definitions of relapse, retrospective versus prospective assessment, attributional biases in recalling relapse events, single versus multiple determinants of relapse, static versus dynamic assessment models, and the necessary level of specificity involved in the assessment of relapse categories. Additionally, general domains representing distal personal characteristics, intermediate background variables and factors proximal in time to relapse situations are reviewed. Potential variables appropriate for assessment within each of these domains are described. It is concluded that relapse is best understood as a complex process having multiple and interactive determinants that vary in their temporal proximity from and their relative influence on relapse. An adequate assessment model must be sufficiently comprehensive to include theoretically relevant variables from each of the multiple domains and different levels of potential predictors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8997779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  19 in total

Review 1.  A quantitative review of the ubiquitous relapse curve.

Authors:  Ari P Kirshenbaum; Darlene M Olsen; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2008-06-24

2.  Psychometric evaluation of the Drinking Patterns Questionnaire: a measure of high-risk drinking situations.

Authors:  David P Menges; Barbara S McCrady; Elizabeth E Epstein; Charles Beem
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Cortical thickness, surface area, and volume of the brain reward system in alcohol dependence: relationships to relapse and extended abstinence.

Authors:  Timothy C Durazzo; Duygu Tosun; Shannon Buckley; Stefan Gazdzinski; Anderson Mon; Susanna L Fryer; Dieter J Meyerhoff
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Individual differences in anterior cingulate activation associated with attentional bias predict cocaine use after treatment.

Authors:  Reshmi Marhe; Maartje Luijten; Ben J M van de Wetering; Marion Smits; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Predictors of heavy drinking during and following treatment.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2011-09

6.  Cortical perfusion in alcohol-dependent individuals during short-term abstinence: relationships to resumption of hazardous drinking after treatment.

Authors:  Timothy C Durazzo; Stefan Gazdzinski; Anderson Mon; Dieter J Meyerhoff
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 7.  Predicting treatment outcome in stimulant dependence.

Authors:  Martina Reske; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Predicting post-treatment-initiation alcohol use among patients with severe mental illness and alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Clara M Bradizza; Stephen A Maisto; Paula C Vincent; Paul R Stasiewicz; Gerard J Connors; Nicole D Mercer
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-12

9.  How Patients Recovering From Alcoholism Use a Smartphone Intervention.

Authors:  Fiona M McTavish; Ming-Yuan Chih; Dhavan Shah; David H Gustafson
Journal:  J Dual Diagn       Date:  2012-11-08

10.  Brain mu-opioid receptor binding: relationship to relapse to cocaine use after monitored abstinence.

Authors:  David A Gorelick; Yu Kyeong Kim; Badreddine Bencherif; Susan J Boyd; Richard Nelson; Marc L Copersino; Robert F Dannals; J James Frost
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.