Literature DB >> 8996736

Comparative susceptibility of clinical group A, B, C, F, and G beta-hemolytic streptococcal isolates to 24 antimicrobial drugs.

W H Traub1, B Leonhard.   

Abstract

A total of 312 clinical beta-hemolytic streptococcal isolates (Streptococcus pyogenes, group A = 63; Streptococcus agalactiae, group B = 145; group C = 50; group F = 27; group G = 27) were examined for susceptibility to 23 and 24 antimicrobial drugs with the Bauer-Kirby agar disk diffusion and the agar dilution method, respectively. Sheep blood Mueller-Hinton agar served as the reference medium. Wilkins-Chalgren agar supported optimal growth of group A and B, but not of all group C, F, and G streptococci. The group A streptococci were susceptible to all beta-lactam antibiotics, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, rifampin, teicoplanin, and vancomycin, but resistant to cotrimoxazole, fusidic acid, and, except for 2 strains, to fosfomycin. Resistance (R)/intermediate susceptibility (I) rates (R/I%) to ciprofloxacin (0/2%), ofloxacin (1/2%), erythromycin (1.6/0%), and clarithromycin (0/1%) were low. Higher resistance rates were noted with tetracyclines (doxycycline 23.8/15.9%; tetracycline 39.7/3.2%). Among the group B streptococcal isolates, one strain was resistant against oxacillin and of intermediate susceptibility to penicillin G and cefoxitin. All isolates were susceptible to teicoplanin and rifampin. Conversely, all group B isolates were resistant to cotrimoxazole and fusidic acid; 69% and 51% of these isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin and rifampin, respectively. R/I rates of the group B streptococcal isolates were low for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin (0/0.7%), clindamycin (0.7/0%), erythromycin (1.4/ 3.5%), clarithromycin (1.4/0%), and chloramphenicol (0.7/0%). Resistance to tetracyclines was significant (doxycycline: 72.4/2.1%; tetracycline; 74.5/1.4%). Among the non-A, non-B beta-hemolytic streptococci, 2 group C strains were resistant to oxacillin and showed intermediate susceptibility to penicillin G. All isolates were susceptible to third and fourth-generation cephalosporins, imipenem, chloramphenicol, rifampin, teicoplanin, and vancomycin. R/I rates to the other antimicrobial drugs were: ciprofloxacin (3.9/1.9%), ofloxacin (2.9/1.9%), clindamycin (2.9/1%), erythromycin (5.8/0%), clarithromycin (3.8/2.9%), and cotrimoxazole (16.4/3.9%). Resistance against tetracyclines was more frequent (doxycycline: 18.3/2.9%; tetracycline: 20.2/6.7%). On the basis of various minor discrepancies between MIC and disk diffusion test results, it is proposed that the current NCCLS inhibition zone (diameter, mm) criteria indicative of intermediate susceptibility of beta-hemolytic streptococci be changed for the following antimicrobial drugs: ampicillin: 22-27 mm (only for group A and B beta-hemolytic streptococci); ciprofloxacin: 16-18 mm; clindamycin: 15-18 mm; doxycycline: 17-19 mm; tetracycline: 17-19 mm, and erythromycin: 14-19 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8996736     DOI: 10.1159/000239529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemotherapy        ISSN: 0009-3157            Impact factor:   2.544


  17 in total

1.  Antibiotic susceptibility and mechanisms of erythromycin resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: French multicenter study.

Authors:  D De Mouy; J D Cavallo; R Leclercq; R Fabre
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Response of Different Antibiotic Resistant Group of Streptococcus pyogenes to Environmental Stresses.

Authors:  Naser Abbas; Mahmoud Ismail; Mohamed El-Shahat Ebeid
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 3.  Fosfomycin: an old, new friend?

Authors:  M Popovic; D Steinort; S Pillai; C Joukhadar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Is Streptococcus pyogenes resistant or susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole?

Authors:  Asha C Bowen; Rachael A Lilliebridge; Steven Y C Tong; Robert W Baird; Peter Ward; Malcolm I McDonald; Bart J Currie; Jonathan R Carapetis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Analysis of urine-specific antibiograms from veterans to guide empiric therapy for suspected urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Ketzela J Marsh; Lesley Mundy; John J Holter; James R Johnson
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Late-onset bleb-related endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae.

Authors:  Hideaki Kawakami; Yuko Nakane; Hiroko Inuzuka; Tominori Fukagawa; Toshihiro Muto; Kiyofumi Mochizuki; Kiyofumi Ohkusu; Hiroyuki Suematsu; Yuka Yamagishi; Hiroshige Mikamo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  The other group G Streptococcus: increased detection of Streptococcus canis ulcer infections in dog owners.

Authors:  Maggie M Lam; Jill E Clarridge; E J Young; Sally Mizuki
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Serotypes and genotypes of erythromycin-resistant group B streptococci in Korea.

Authors:  Young Uh; In Ho Jang; Gyu Yel Hwang; Mi Kyung Lee; Kap Jun Yoon; Hyo Youl Kim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Six-month multicenter study on invasive infections due to group B streptococci in Argentina.

Authors:  Horacio A Lopardo; Patricia Vidal; Paola Jeric; Daniela Centron; Hugo Paganini; Richard R Facklam; John Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Clonal relatedness of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes isolates in Germany.

Authors:  Ralf R Reinert; Rudolf Lütticken; Joyce A Sutcliffe; Amelia Tait-Kamradt; Murat Y Cil; Holger M Schorn; André Bryskier; Adnan Al-Lahham
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.