Literature DB >> 8996530

Comparison of the potency of glycosylated and nonglycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in neutropenic and nonneutropenic CD rats.

G J Nohynek1, J P Plard, M Y Wells, A Zerial, F Roquet.   

Abstract

Recent studies in human bone-marrow culture and healthy human volunteers suggest that lenograstim [glycosylated, recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) produced in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells] has greater in vivo potency than filgrastim [nonglycosylated, methionine-extended recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rmetHuG-CSF) produced in Escherichia coli]. To confirm and extend these results we investigated the in vivo potency of both products in normal rats and neutropenic CD rats as an animal model of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. In normal rats, groups of eight normal male CD rats received four subcutaneous doses of 10, 30, or 100 micrograms/kg filgrastim or lenograstim on days 1-4 of the study, whereas a control group received the vehicle. Blood samples were collected from each animal before treatment (day -5) and on days 2, 3, 5, 8, and 12 of the study for determination of red blood cell (RBC), platelet, white blood cell (WBC), and differential counts. rHuG-CSF and r-metHuG-CSF produced increased WBC counts, principally due to elevated absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs); on days 2, 3, and 5, all groups receiving rG-CSF had ANCs that increased in a progressive and dose-related manner. With the exception of a single value, mean ANCs obtained on days 2, 3, and 5 in lenograstim-treated groups were higher (statistically significant on day 3 at 30 and 100 micrograms/kg and on day 5 at 10, 30, and 100 micrograms/kg) than the respective values obtained in filgrastim-treated groups. No compound-related effect was noted in RBC or platelet parameters. Neutropenia was induced in male CD rats (12 animals/group) with a single intraperitoneal dose of 50 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (CPA) on day 0. On days 1-4, CPA-treated groups were treated with the vehicle (control) or with filgrastim or lenograstim at 30 or 100 micrograms/kg per day. An additional group was not treated with CPA and served as the absolute control group. Blood was collected from alternating subgroups on study day -5 (pretest) and on days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 12 for determination of RBC, platelet, WBC, and differential counts. No major adverse in-life effect was noted in neutropenic rats. Maximal depression of WBCs and ANCs occurred on day 5, followed by recovery to normal values by days 9 (ANC) and 12 (WBC). On day 3 and days 5-9, rHuG-CSF- and metHuG-CSF-treated groups had marked and dose-related increases in WBCs as compared with CPA-treated controls, principally due to elevated ANCs. With the exception of a few values, mean ANC values obtained in lenograstim-treated groups were consistently higher than the respective values obtained in filgrastim-treated groups; the difference was statistically significant on day 3 (30-microgram/kg groups) and on days 6 and 8 (100-microgram/kg groups). In conclusion, treatment of normal and neutropenic CD rats with lenograstim resulted in a dose-related elevation of ANCs that was consistently and significantly higher than the response to identical doses of filgrastim. These results suggest that lenograstim, the glycosylated form of rG-CSF, has superior in vivo potency in normal and neutropenic animals as compared with filgrastim, the nonglycosylated form of rG-CSF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8996530     DOI: 10.1007/s002800050570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  7 in total

1.  Is exposure to formaldehyde in air causally associated with leukemia?--A hypothesis-based weight-of-evidence analysis.

Authors:  Lorenz R Rhomberg; Lisa A Bailey; Julie E Goodman; Ali K Hamade; David Mayfield
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim: effects on blood cell recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  A Hüttmann; K Schirsafi; S Seeber; P Bojko
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Production of biologically active human granulocyte colony stimulating factor in the milk of transgenic goat.

Authors:  J H Ko; C S Lee; K H Kim; M G Pang; J S Koo; N Fang; D B Koo; K B Oh; W S Youn; G D Zheng; J S Park; S J Kim; Y M Han; I Y Choi; J Lim; S T Shin; S W Jin; K K Lee; O J Yoo
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  Glycosylated and non-glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF)--what is the difference?

Authors:  M Höglund
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  N-linked glycosylation is required for optimal function of Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus-encoded, but not cellular, interleukin 6.

Authors:  Charles S Dela Cruz; Yoomi Lee; Srinivas R Viswanathan; Ayman S El-Guindy; Jennifer Gerlach; Sarah Nikiforow; Duane Shedd; Lyn Gradoville; George Miller
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2004-02-16       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  Hematopoietic properties of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor/immunoglobulin (G-CSF/IgG-Fc) fusion proteins in normal and neutropenic rodents.

Authors:  George N Cox; Elizabeth A Chlipala; Darin J Smith; Sharon J Carlson; Stacie J Bell; Daniel H Doherty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Preclinical and clinical phase I studies of a new recombinant Filgrastim (BK0023) in comparison with Neupogen®.

Authors:  Davide Crobu; Gaia Spinetti; Rodolfo Schrepfer; Giancarlo Tonon; Gloria Saccani Jotti; Pierluigi Onali; Simona Dedoni; Gaetano Orsini; Andrea Di Stefano
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.483

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.