Literature DB >> 8996331

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: experience with the initial 30 cases.

R G Moore1, T D Averch, P G Schulam, J B Adams, R N Chen, L R Kavoussi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the intermediate effectiveness of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 pyeloplasties was performed for symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction (24 primary and 6 secondary cases). Two separate types of reconstruction were performed, that is dismembered (26 patients) and Y-V (4) pyeloplasty. All patients were followed with excretory urography or diuretic renography. Moreover, factors affecting the learning curve (surgical technique, prior laparoscopic experience and cause of obstruction) were evaluated.
RESULTS: A lower pole segmental renal vessel was found at the ureteropelvic junction in 18 patients (60%). Operative time ranged from 2.25 to 8.0 hours (mean 4.5). Postoperative morbidity (mean narcotic requirement 37.3 mg. morphine sulfate, mean hospital stay 3.5 days and convalescence 3 weeks) was minimum. At radiographic followup (mean 16.3 months, range 4 to 73) 97% of the patients demonstrated a patent ureteropelvic junction and resolution of or substantial decrease in hydronephrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: In the hands of an experienced laparoscopist, outcomes indicate that laparoscopic pyeloplasty shows success similar to that of open pyeloplasty but longer term outcomes must be assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8996331     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65170-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  [Reconstructive procedures in laparoscopic urology].

Authors:  G Janetschek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Learning curves in orthopaedic surgery: a case for super-specialisation?

Authors:  N P M Jain; A J L Jowett; N M P Clarke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty, initial experience in the management of UPJO.

Authors:  V J Gnanapragasam; T G Armitage
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  [Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with Anderson-Hynes technique].

Authors:  S Deger; J Roigas; A Wille; M Giessing; B Schönberger; I A Türk
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Robotics in urology.

Authors:  Luke A McGuinness; Bhavan Prasad Rai
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  A transperitoneal laparoscopic approach to endourology.

Authors:  A M Kaynan; H N Winfield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 7.  Taking the side of transperitoneal access for surgery in upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Sam B Bhayani; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.862

8.  Ureteroscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma and ureteropelvic obstruction.

Authors:  Sebastien Crouzet; Andre Berger; Manoj Monga; Mihir Desai
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10

9.  Transmesocolic approach for left side laparoscopic pyeloplasty: comparison with laterocolic approach in the initial learning period.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Han; Won Sik Ham; Jang Hwan Kim; Chang Hee Hong; Young Deuk Choi; Sang Won Han; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Adult stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Arieh L Shalhav; Albert A Mikhail; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ofer N Gofrit; Glenn S Gerber; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.