Literature DB >> 8996194

Discriminative stimulus effects of zolpidem in pentobarbital-trained subjects: I. Comparison with triazolam in rhesus monkeys and rats.

J K Rowlett1, W L Woolverton.   

Abstract

The present study compared the discriminative stimulus effects of the imidazopyridine, zolpidem, with a triazolobenzodiazepine, triazolam, in pentobarbital-trained rhesus monkeys and rats. Rhesus monkeys (n = 4), trained to discriminate pentobarbital (10 mg/kg intragastric [i.g.]) from saline under a FR 1 discrete-trials shock avoidance procedure, were given zolpidem (0.10-30 mg/kg i.g.) or triazolam (0.01-0.3 mg/kg i.g.). Both zolpidem and triazolam produced dose-dependent increases in pentobarbital-appropriate responding that reached 80% or greater at the highest doses tested. Zolpidem, but not triazolam, increased latency to respond in a dose-dependent manner. Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 12), trained to discriminate pentobarbital (8.0 mg/kg i.p.) from saline under a FR 10 schedule of food reinforcement, were given zolpidem (0.50-4.0 mg/kg i.p.; 5-, 15- and 45-min pretreatment) or triazolam (0.025-0.20 mg/kg i.p., 15-min pretreatment). Zolpidem occasioned intermediate drug-appropriate responding (maximum group mean = 48%) at the 5- and 15-min pretreatment times and no drug-appropriate responding at the 45-min pretreatment time. In contrast, triazolam occasioned > or = 80% pentobarbital-appropriate responding at 0.10 and 0.20 mg/kg. Both zolpidem and triazolam produced dose-dependent decreases in the rate of responding. The rate-decreasing effects of zolpidem were maximal at the 5-min pretreatment time and had dissipated after the 45-min pretreatment time. Further studies were conducted in rats to equate procedural variables between the monkey and rat studies. When the FR was reduced from 10 to 1, zolpidem occasioned 26 to 62% pentobarbital-appropriate responding over a dose range of 1.0 to 6.0 mg/kg i.p. After i.g. administration, zolpidem occasioned 100% drug-appropriate responding at the highest dose tested (6.0 mg/kg); however, only two of seven rats responded. Taken together, these data raise the possibility of a species difference between non-human primates and rats in the pentobarbital-like discriminative stimulus effects of zolpidem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8996194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  5 in total

1.  Benzodiazepine and neuroactive steroid combinations in rats: anxiolytic-like and discriminative stimulus effects.

Authors:  Barak W Gunter; Sherman A Jones; Ian A Paul; Donna M Platt; James K Rowlett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  The behavioral pharmacology of zolpidem: evidence for the functional significance of α1-containing GABA(A) receptors.

Authors:  Amanda C Fitzgerald; Brittany T Wright; Scott A Heldt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Enhanced sucrose pellet consumption induced by benzodiazepine-type drugs in squirrel monkeys: role of GABAA receptor subtypes.

Authors:  Angela N Duke; Donna M Platt; James M Cook; Shengming Huang; Wenyuan Yin; Bruce A Mattingly; James K Rowlett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Differential interactions engendered by benzodiazepine and neuroactive steroid combinations on schedule-controlled responding in rats.

Authors:  Barak W Gunter; Donna M Platt; James K Rowlett
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Development of a translational model to screen medications for cocaine use disorder II: Choice between intravenous cocaine and money in humans.

Authors:  Joshua A Lile; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush; S Stevens Negus; Paul E A Glaser; Kevin W Hatton; Lon R Hays
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 4.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.