Literature DB >> 8996134

Evaluation of new bone resorption markers in a randomized comparison of pamidronate or clodronate for hypercalcemia of malignancy.

J Vinholes1, C Y Guo, O P Purohit, R Eastell, R E Coleman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of two bisphosphonates on markers of bone resorption in a randomized double-blind trial for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with a serum calcium (sCa) level > or = 2.7 mmol/L that persisted after 48 hours of saline rehydration were randomized to receive pamidronate 90 mg or clodronate 1,500 mg. Bone resorption markers measured included urinary calcium (uCa), hydroxyproline (Hyp), deoxypyridinoline (Dpd), pyridinoline (Pyd), the cross-linking molecule at either the N-telopeptide (NTx) or the C-telopeptide (Crosslaps) regions of type I collagen, and free Dpd.
RESULTS: Both bisphosphonates restored normocalcemia, but the duration of action was longer after pamidronate (P < .01). There was a mean pretreatment sevenfold increase in NTx, fivefold increase in Dpd and Crosslaps, and 2.5-fold increase in free Dpd. The changes in uCa were confounded by an increase in parathyroid hormone (PTH) (P < .05), which, through effects on the kidney, inhibits calcium excretion. Most resorption markers showed a larger decrease after pamidronate than clodronate (P < .01). NTx and Crosslaps showed the greatest decrease, being significantly different from any other marker in both arms (P < .01). There was a significant correlation between Dpd, NTx, and Crosslaps (P < .002), but not with uCa.
CONCLUSION: The superiority of pamidronate in controlling hypercalcemia is mirrored by the changes observed in these markers. uCa is not an accurate bone resorption marker, which reflects the renal handling of calcium by PTH. NTx and Crosslaps showed the largest increase at baseline and the greatest change after treatment, which suggests these new markers may be more sensitive indicators of bone resorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8996134     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

1.  Cancer-associated hypercalcemia: validation of a bedside prognostic score.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Sylvain Dewas; Aurélien Hoffman; Antoine Adenis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Phase II studies of two different schedules of dasatinib in bone metastasis predominant metastatic breast cancer: SWOG S0622.

Authors:  Anne F Schott; William E Barlow; Catherine H Van Poznak; Daniel F Hayes; Carol M Moinpour; Danika L Lew; Philip A Dy; Evan T Keller; Jill M Keller; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Pamidronate. A review of its use in the management of osteolytic bone metastases, tumour-induced hypercalcaemia and Paget's disease of bone.

Authors:  A J Coukell; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Bisphosphonates in bone diseases.

Authors:  R W Sparidans; I M Twiss; S Talbot
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1998-10

5.  Assessment of bone response to systemic therapy in an EORTC trial: preliminary experience with the use of collagen cross-link excretion. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  J Vinholes; R Coleman; D Lacombe; C Rose; M Tubiana-Hulin; P Bastit; J Wildiers; J Michel; R Leonard; J Nortier; F Mignolet; J Ford
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Comparative efficacy and safety of bone-modifying agents for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kenji Omae; Yasushi Tsujimoto; Michitaka Honda; Tsunenori Kondo; Kazunari Tanabe; Shunichi Fukuhara; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.