Literature DB >> 8995062

Pattern and timing of evolutionary divergences among hominoids based on analyses of complete mtDNAs.

U Arnason1, A Gullberg, A Janke, X Xu.   

Abstract

We have examined and dated primate divergences by applying a newly established molecular/ paleontological reference, the evolutionary separation between artiodactyls and cetaceans anchored at 60 million years before present (MYBP). Owing to the morphological transformations coinciding with the transition from terrestrial to aquatic (marine) life and the large body size of the animals (which makes their fossils easier to find), this reference can be defined, paleontologically, within much narrower time limits compared to any local primate calibration marker hitherto applied for dating hominoid divergences. Application of the artiodactyl/ cetacean reference (A/C-60) suggests that hominoid divergences took place much earlier than has been concluded previously. According to a homogeneous-rate model of sequence evolution, the primary hominoid divergence, i.e., that between the families Hylobatidae (gibbons) and Hominidae, was dated at approximately 36 MYBP. The corresponding dating for the divergence between Pongo (orangutan) and Gorilla-Pan (chimpanzee) -Homo is approximately 24.5 MYBP, that for Gorilla vs Homo-Pan is approximately 18 MYBP, and that for Homo vs Pan approximately 13.5 MYBP. The split between Sumatran and Bornean orangutans was dated at approximately 10.5 MYBP and that between the common and pygmy chimpanzees at approximately 7 MYBP. Analyses of a single gene (cytochrome b) suggest that the divergence within the Catarrhini, i.e., between Hominoidea and Old World monkeys (Cercopithecoidea), took place > 40 MYBP; that within the Anthropoidea, i.e., between Catarrhini and Platyrrhini (New World monkeys), > 60 MYBP; and that between Anthropoidea and Prosimii (lemur), approximately 80 MYBP. These separation times are about two times more ancient than those applied previously as references for the dating of hominoid divergences. The present findings automatically imply a much slower evolution in hominoid DNA (both mitochondrial and nuclear) than commonly recognized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8995062     DOI: 10.1007/bf02202113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  52 in total

1.  The multiregional evolution of humans.

Authors:  A G Thorne; M H Wolpoff
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.142

2.  Epilogue: a personal account of the origins of a new paradigm.

Authors:  M Goodman
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Comparison between the complete mitochondrial DNA sequences of Homo and the common chimpanzee based on nonchimeric sequences.

Authors:  U Arnason; X Xu; A Gullberg
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals.

Authors:  S B Hedges; P H Parker; C G Sibley; S Kumar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Determining divergence times of the major kingdoms of living organisms with a protein clock.

Authors:  R F Doolittle; D F Feng; S Tsang; G Cho; E Little
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-01-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Complete nucleotide sequences of the domestic cat (Felis catus) mitochondrial genome and a transposed mtDNA tandem repeat (Numt) in the nuclear genome.

Authors:  J V Lopez; S Cevario; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Insertions and duplications of mtDNA in the nuclear genomes of Old World monkeys and hominoids.

Authors:  R V Collura; C B Stewart
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  DNA DIVERGENCE AMONG HOMINOIDS.

Authors:  Adalgisa Caccone; Jeffrey R Powell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Comparison between the complete mtDNA sequences of the blue and the fin whale, two species that can hybridize in nature.

Authors:  U Arnason; A Gullberg
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  24 in total

1.  Incisor-molar relationships in chimpanzees and other hominoids: implications for diet and phylogeny.

Authors:  Martin Pickford
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Placing confidence limits on the molecular age of the human-chimpanzee divergence.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Alan Filipski; Vinod Swarna; Alan Walker; S Blair Hedges
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Zoo-fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of human and Indian muntjac karyotypes (Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis) reveals satellite DNA clusters at the margins of conserved syntenic segments.

Authors:  L Frönicke; H Scherthan
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Characterization of SRp46, a novel human SR splicing factor encoded by a PR264/SC35 retropseudogene.

Authors:  J Soret; R Gattoni; C Guyon; A Sureau; M Popielarz; E Le Rouzic; S Dumon; F Apiou; B Dutrillaux; H Voss; W Ansorge; J Stévenin; B Perbal
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the wallaroo (Macropus robustus) and the phylogenetic relationship among Monotremata, Marsupialia, and Eutheria.

Authors:  A Janke; X Xu; U Arnason
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Old World fruitbat phylogeny: evidence for convergent evolution and an endemic African clade.

Authors:  L J Hollar; M S Springer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Reconstructing phylogenies and phenotypes: a molecular view of human evolution.

Authors:  Brenda J Bradley
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Large differences between LINE-1 amplification rates in the human and chimpanzee lineages.

Authors:  Lauren M Mathews; Susan Y Chi; Noam Greenberg; Igor Ovchinnikov; Gary D Swergold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Analyses of mitochondrial genomes strongly support a hippopotamus-whale clade.

Authors:  B M Ursing; U Arnason
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Radiation of extant marsupials after the K/T boundary: evidence from complete mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Maria A Nilsson; Anette Gullberg; Angel E Spotorno; Ulfur Arnason; Axel Janke
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.