Literature DB >> 89949

Event-related potentials recorded from young and old adults during a memory retrieval task.

J M Ford, W T Roth, R C Mohs, W F Hopkins, B S Kopell.   

Abstract

Six healthy old and 8 healthy young subjects each received a series of trials in a memory retrieval task devised by Sternberg (1966). On each trials, the subject received a memory set of 1-4 digits and was then shown a test digit. The subject's task was to press one of two response buttons indicating whether the test digit was a member of the memory set for that trial. Response time (RT) was found to be an increasing, linear function of the number of items held in memory. The slope of the RT function was a composite measure of the time necessary to process each additional item in memory while the intercept was a measure of stimulus encoding and response processes that do not depend on memory set size (see Sternberg 1966, 1969, 1975). We found that the latency of P3 to the test stimulus also increased with increases in memory set size, although the slope of the P3 was less than that for RT. We have suggested that the intercept of the P3 slope reflects the time it takes to encode the test stimulus before the evaluation of the stimulus starts, while the slope reflects the amount of time per digit needed to evaluate the set. We have suggested that the difference between RT and P3 slopes represents the additional time per digit which the subjects waits before making a response, due to low confidence occurring with more difficult task conditions (i.e., when set size = 4). We further suggest that the intercept of the RT-P3 latency slope is a reflection of pure response processes. Time estimates of these processes are made for young and old subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 89949     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(79)90161-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  15 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

Review 2.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Age differences in contingent negative variation activity of healthy young adults and presenile subjects.

Authors:  R Zappoli; A Versari; M Paganini; G Arnetoli; V Roma; A Battaglia; S Porcù
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1988-06

4.  Event-related brain potentials in male hypogonadism.

Authors:  M Ozata; Z Odabasi; S Caglayan; Z Beyhan; O Vural; C Ozdemir
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Performance tests.

Authors:  A Wetherell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Response-specific slowing in older age revealed through differential stimulus and response effects on P300 latency and reaction time.

Authors:  Theodore R Bashore; Scott A Wylie; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Jacques M Martinerie
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2013-11-06

7.  Event-related brain potential correlates of the processing of novel visual and auditory information in autism.

Authors:  E Courchesne; A J Lincoln; B A Kilman; R Galambos
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1985-03

8.  Electrophysiological evidence for aging effects on local contextual processing.

Authors:  Noa Fogelson; Mona Shah; Frederique Bonnet-Brilhault; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Perceptual chunking and its effect on memory in speech processing: ERP and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Annie C Gilbert; Victor J Boucher; Boutheina Jemel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-19

10.  Electrophysiological correlates of morphological processing in Chinese compound word recognition.

Authors:  Yingchun Du; Weiping Hu; Zhuo Fang; John X Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.