BACKGROUND: Oral estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is known to stimulate the synthesis of angiotensinogen. The effects of such therapy on renin, ACE, and aldosterone are less clear. This seems noteworthy, however, since further activation of the system could be disadvantageous to postmenopausal women who replace estrogen in the context of heart failure, coronary artery disease, or hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Estrogen status and components of the renin-angiotensin system were examined in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women and age-matched men. Renin was quantified immunoradiometrically, ie, independent of substrate abundance; aldosterone, angiotensinogen, and ACE activity were determined by standard methods. Renin levels were lower in women with ERT (n = 107; 12.0 +/- 0.7 mU/L) compared with women without ERT (n = 223; 16.6 +/- 0.9 mU/L; P = .001) or men (n = 342, 20.5 +/- 1.5 mU/L, P < .0001). In contrast, angiotensinogen was higher in women with ERT (1.36 +/- 0.08 mg/L) compared with women without ERT (1.03 +/- 0.02 mg/L; P < .0001) or compared with men (0.97 +/- 0.01 mg/L; P < .0001). Renin suppression was seen with either oral or transdermal estrogen replacement (-30% and -31%, respectively; both P < .001). In contrast, the increase of angiotensinogen was limited to women taking oral estrogens (+58%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that these estrogen effects were independent of age, body mass index, blood pressure, and/or antihypertensive medication. Finally, only marginal differences between groups were observed for serum ACE activity and aldosterone. CONCLUSIONS: Aside from a well-documented induction of angiotensinogen, ERT is related to a substantial suppression of renin, a phenomenon that might have received little attention because of widely used indirect measurements of the hormone.
BACKGROUND: Oral estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is known to stimulate the synthesis of angiotensinogen. The effects of such therapy on renin, ACE, and aldosterone are less clear. This seems noteworthy, however, since further activation of the system could be disadvantageous to postmenopausal women who replace estrogen in the context of heart failure, coronary artery disease, or hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Estrogen status and components of the renin-angiotensin system were examined in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women and age-matched men. Renin was quantified immunoradiometrically, ie, independent of substrate abundance; aldosterone, angiotensinogen, and ACE activity were determined by standard methods. Renin levels were lower in women with ERT (n = 107; 12.0 +/- 0.7 mU/L) compared with women without ERT (n = 223; 16.6 +/- 0.9 mU/L; P = .001) or men (n = 342, 20.5 +/- 1.5 mU/L, P < .0001). In contrast, angiotensinogen was higher in women with ERT (1.36 +/- 0.08 mg/L) compared with women without ERT (1.03 +/- 0.02 mg/L; P < .0001) or compared with men (0.97 +/- 0.01 mg/L; P < .0001). Renin suppression was seen with either oral or transdermal estrogen replacement (-30% and -31%, respectively; both P < .001). In contrast, the increase of angiotensinogen was limited to women taking oral estrogens (+58%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that these estrogen effects were independent of age, body mass index, blood pressure, and/or antihypertensive medication. Finally, only marginal differences between groups were observed for serum ACE activity and aldosterone. CONCLUSIONS: Aside from a well-documented induction of angiotensinogen, ERT is related to a substantial suppression of renin, a phenomenon that might have received little attention because of widely used indirect measurements of the hormone.
Authors: Taofeek K Owonikoko; Maria E Fabucci; Philip R Brown; Nighat Nisar; John Hilton; William B Mathews; Hayden T Ravert; Paige Rauseo; Kathryn Sandberg; Robert F Dannals; Zsolt Szabo Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Angelo Agostoni; Emel Aygören-Pürsün; Karen E Binkley; Alvaro Blanch; Konrad Bork; Laurence Bouillet; Christoph Bucher; Anthony J Castaldo; Marco Cicardi; Alvin E Davis; Caterina De Carolis; Christian Drouet; Christiane Duponchel; Henriette Farkas; Kálmán Fáy; Béla Fekete; Bettina Fischer; Luigi Fontana; George Füst; Roberto Giacomelli; Albrecht Gröner; C Erik Hack; George Harmat; John Jakenfelds; Mathias Juers; Lajos Kalmár; Pál N Kaposi; István Karádi; Arianna Kitzinger; Tímea Kollár; Wolfhart Kreuz; Peter Lakatos; Hilary J Longhurst; Margarita Lopez-Trascasa; Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer; Nicole Monnier; István Nagy; Eva Németh; Erik Waage Nielsen; Jan H Nuijens; Caroline O'grady; Emanuela Pappalardo; Vincenzo Penna; Carlo Perricone; Roberto Perricone; Ursula Rauch; Olga Roche; Eva Rusicke; Peter J Späth; George Szendei; Edit Takács; Attila Tordai; Lennart Truedsson; Lilian Varga; Beáta Visy; Kayla Williams; Andrea Zanichelli; Lorenza Zingale Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Přemysl Mladěnka; Lenka Applová; Jiří Patočka; Vera Marisa Costa; Fernando Remiao; Jana Pourová; Aleš Mladěnka; Jana Karlíčková; Luděk Jahodář; Marie Vopršalová; Kurt J Varner; Martin Štěrba Journal: Med Res Rev Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 12.944
Authors: Jarir Atthobari; Ron T Gansevoort; Sipke T Visser; Paul E de Jong; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.335