Literature DB >> 8990454

An in-line suturing device to simplify sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension.

L R Lind1, J Choe, N N Bhatia.   

Abstract

A disposable suturing instrument is used in our surgical method for sacrospinous vault suspension to facilitate suture placement and retrieval. The pararectal space is dissected and the suturing device is placed just medial to the lateral third of the sacrospinous ligament-coccygeus muscle complex. Depression of the device's firing button advances a standard needle in a controlled circular path through the sacrospinous ligament-coccygeus muscle complex. The needle is retrieved with a straight-needle holder at a consistent location, 3 mm from the shaft of the instrument. A second suture is placed 0.5-1 cm medial to the first suture. If the holding strength for either suture is considered inadequate, the device is reloaded with the same suture and subsequent bites are taken. The procedure is completed using standard methods. In ten women treated for vaginal vault eversion, lateral dissection was completed in less than 10 minutes, and passage of two sutures through the sacrospinous ligament was accomplished in less than 2 minutes. There were no complications. One patient described mild buttock pain that resolved in 1 week. At 4-6 months' follow-up, vaginal examination with maximal straining demonstrated direct apposition of the vaginal wall to the sacrospinous ligament.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8990454     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00354-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  The tensile strength of Cooper's ligament suturing: comparison of abdominal and transvaginal techniques.

Authors:  Roger P Goldberg; Sumana Koduri; Peter K Sand; Christina Kwon; Patrick Culligan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-06-23

2.  Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?

Authors:  Axel Sauerwald; Inke Bruns; Barbara Peveling; Hendrik Brunke; Friedrich Wolff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Introducing a true minimally invasive meshless and dissectionless anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Masha Tsivian; Adi Y Weintraub; Menahem Neuman; Alex Tsivian
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Uterine prolapse: from antiquity to today.

Authors:  Keith T Downing
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-11-14

5.  Safety and short term outcomes of a new truly minimallyinvasive mesh-less and dissection-less anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse apical repair.

Authors:  Adi Y Weintraub; Masha Ben Zvi; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Yonatan Reuven; Menahem Neuman; Alex Tsivian
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Responsibility toward affordable healthcare: disposable versus reusable methods for pelvic floor repair.

Authors:  Ivilina Pandeva; Helen Johnson; Mark Slack; Ashish Pradhan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.