Literature DB >> 8990429

One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy.

S J Chapman1, J Owen, J C Hauth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a low transverse cesarean closure method in one or two layers affects subsequent pregnancy outcome.
METHODS: In a prospective trial reported previously, 906 women were assigned randomly to either one- or two-layer uterine closure. One hundred sixty-four women had a subsequent pregnancy and delivery (18 weeks' gestation or longer) at our institution. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were ascertained by medical chart review and compared between the one- and two-layer closure groups.
RESULTS: Of the 164 subsequent deliveries, 83 had previous closure in one layer, whereas 81 had involved a two-layer closure. The demographic characteristics of these two groups were similar. Nineteen women (12%) underwent elective repeat cesareans without labor, and the remaining 145 experienced labor. Length of labor, mode of delivery, duration of hospital stay, gestation at delivery, and the incidences of uterine scar dehiscence, chorioamnionitis, postpartum metritis, hemorrhage, transfusion, and abnormal placentation did not differ significantly between the groups. Selected neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores, cord pH, birth weight, and perinatal death, were similar between groups as well.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the type of low transverse cesarean closure does not significantly affect the outcome of the next pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8990429     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)84257-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Prospective, randomized, comparative study of Misgav Ladach versus traditional cesarean section at Nazareth Hospital, Kenya.

Authors:  L Ansaloni; R Brundisini; G Morino; A Kiura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E Abalos; V Addo; P Brocklehurst; M El Sheikh; B Farrell; S Gray; P Hardy; E Juszczak; J E Mathews; S Naz Masood; E Oyarzun; J Oyieke; J B Sharma; P Spark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional, factorial trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L B Uittenbogaard; W J K Hehenkamp; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  CORONIS - International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: the follow-up study.

Authors:  Edgardo Abalos; Enrique Oyarzun; Victor Addo; J B Sharma; Jiji Matthews; James Oyieke; Shabeen Naz Masood; Mohamed A El Sheikh; Peter Brocklehurst; Barbara Farrell; Shan Gray; Pollyanna Hardy; Nina Jamieson; Ed Juszczak; Patsy Spark
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Effect of single- and double-layer cesarean section closure on residual myometrial thickness and isthmocele - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors:  Greg J Marchand; Ahmed Masoud; Alexa King; Stacy Ruther; Giovanna Brazil; Hollie Ulibarri; Julia Parise; Amanda Arroyo; Catherine Coriell; Sydnee Goetz; Ashley Christensen; Katelyn Sainz
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-12-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.