J E Pritchard1, C A Nowson, J D Wark. 1. Department of Physiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in total and regional body composition using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) after subjects lost weight through change in diet or exercise. DESIGN: A 12-month, randomized, controlled study of two weight-loss interventions-low-fat diet ad libitum or moderate, unsupervised exercise-in free-living, middle-aged men. Compliance was determined at monthly measurement sessions through food records and activity logs; DEXA scans were performed every 3 months. SUBJECTS/ SETTING: Fifty-eight overweight men (mean body mass index = 29.0 +/- 2.6; mean age = 43.4 +/- 5.7 years) recruited from a national corporation were assigned randomly to diet, exercise, or control groups. INTERVENTIONS: One group reduced dietary fat to 26.4% of energy intake but kept activity unchanged; another group self-selected aerobic exercise (three sessions per week at 65% to 75% maximum heart rate) but kept diet unchanged. A control group maintained weight. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 12 months, measurements of weight, total and regional fat mass and lean mass, energy intake, and percentage dietary fat; physical activity indexes. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Results were analyzed using paired t tests and analysis of variance. RESULTS:Mean weight loss was 6.4 +/- 3.3 kg in dieters and 2.6 +/- 3.0 kg in exercisers; control subjects maintained weight. DEXA scans revealed that 40% of dieters' weight loss was lean tissue; more than 80% of weight lost by exercisers was fat. Exercisers maintained limb lean tissue and lost fat mass. CONCLUSIONS:Greater total weight and lean tissue loss occurred when subjects lost weight through a low-fat diet consumed ad libitum than when subjects participated in unsupervised aerobic exercise. Use of DEXA enabled identification of progressive total and regional changes in fat and lean tissue.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in total and regional body composition using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) after subjects lost weight through change in diet or exercise. DESIGN: A 12-month, randomized, controlled study of two weight-loss interventions-low-fat diet ad libitum or moderate, unsupervised exercise-in free-living, middle-aged men. Compliance was determined at monthly measurement sessions through food records and activity logs; DEXA scans were performed every 3 months. SUBJECTS/ SETTING: Fifty-eight overweight men (mean body mass index = 29.0 +/- 2.6; mean age = 43.4 +/- 5.7 years) recruited from a national corporation were assigned randomly to diet, exercise, or control groups. INTERVENTIONS: One group reduced dietary fat to 26.4% of energy intake but kept activity unchanged; another group self-selected aerobic exercise (three sessions per week at 65% to 75% maximum heart rate) but kept diet unchanged. A control group maintained weight. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 12 months, measurements of weight, total and regional fat mass and lean mass, energy intake, and percentage dietary fat; physical activity indexes. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Results were analyzed using paired t tests and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was 6.4 +/- 3.3 kg in dieters and 2.6 +/- 3.0 kg in exercisers; control subjects maintained weight. DEXA scans revealed that 40% of dieters' weight loss was lean tissue; more than 80% of weight lost by exercisers was fat. Exercisers maintained limb lean tissue and lost fat mass. CONCLUSIONS: Greater total weight and lean tissue loss occurred when subjects lost weight through a low-fat diet consumed ad libitum than when subjects participated in unsupervised aerobic exercise. Use of DEXA enabled identification of progressive total and regional changes in fat and lean tissue.
Authors: David C W Lau; James D Douketis; Katherine M Morrison; Irene M Hramiak; Arya M Sharma; Ehud Ur Journal: CMAJ Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Joseph E Donnelly; Stephen D Herrmann; Kate Lambourne; Amanda N Szabo; Jeffery J Honas; Richard A Washburn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Richard A Washburn; Amanda N Szabo; Kate Lambourne; Erik A Willis; Lauren T Ptomey; Jeffery J Honas; Stephen D Herrmann; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: George A Bray; William E Heisel; Ashkan Afshin; Michael D Jensen; William H Dietz; Michael Long; Robert F Kushner; Stephen R Daniels; Thomas A Wadden; Adam G Tsai; Frank B Hu; John M Jakicic; Donna H Ryan; Bruce M Wolfe; Thomas H Inge Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Ryan D Baltic; Rory C Weier; Mira L Katz; Stephenie K Kennedy; Eugene J Lengerich; Samuel M Lesko; David Reese; Karen A Roberto; Nancy E Schoenberg; Gregory S Young; Mark B Dignan; Electra D Paskett Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Edward L Melanson; Sarah Kozey Keadle; Joseph E Donnelly; Barry Braun; Neil A King Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.411