Literature DB >> 8990373

The kidneys that nobody wanted: support for the utilization of expanded criteria donors.

C M Lee1, J D Scandling, G K Shen, O Salvatierra, D C Dafoe, E J Alfrey.   

Abstract

The continuing shortage of cadaveric donors necessitates constant reappraisal of donor refusal criteria. From 1/1/95 to 3/20/96, 180 renal transplants were performed at our center. Of these, 26 were kidney/pancreas, 30 pediatric, 37 live donor adult, and 87 adult cadaveric renal transplants (CRT). In the CRT group there were 31 recipients of kidneys that all other local transplant centers declined. We retrospectively compared this group of kidneys that nobody wanted (KNW) to the remaining 56 CRTs (controls) performed at our center during the same period. Of the 31 recipients of KNW, 18 received kidneys declined for reasons of advanced age, defined as > or =60 years (including 8 who also had a history of hypertension, 4 who also had >10% sclerosed glomeruli on biopsy, and 3 also declined based upon donor quality because of acute injury), 8 for donor quality alone (e.g., prolonged hypotension), 3 on the basis of biopsy results alone, and 2 for anatomic abnormalities. Twelve recipients of KNW were "dual transplanted" with both donor kidneys. Of 27 donor variables compared between the KNW and control groups, only donor age (52+/-17 versus 40+/-17 years, respectively) and lowest total 4-hr urine output (327+/-208 versus 507+/-437 cc, respectively) proved to be significantly different (p< or =0.05). Of the 25 recipient variables examined, a significant difference was found only in serum creatinine at one month posttransplant (2.6+/-1.8 versus 1.8+/-1.0 mg/dl, respectively), although there was no difference in serum creatinine at three and six months. Actuarial one year patient (100 vs. 95%) and graft (97 vs. 91%) survival, KNW vs. controls respectively, are excellent to date. Further analyses showed no differences in outcome variables between recipients of KNW versus controls when the donor age was > or =60 years. Similar outcome was achieved by transplanting both kidneys from a KNW donor into a single recipient as compared with single-kidney transplantation from control donors. Careful donor-recipient pairing using kidneys from advanced-age donors for smaller, advanced-age recipients provided good short-term outcome. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in short-term outcome in recipients of KNW versus controls despite differences in donor age and lowest total 4-hr urine output. We believe that, with careful consideration, existing donor selection criteria can be expanded to include certain donors previously considered unusable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8990373     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199612270-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  9 in total

1.  Intermediate-term outcomes with expanded criteria deceased donors in kidney transplantation: a spectrum or specter of quality?

Authors:  Robert J Stratta; Michael S Rohr; Aimee K Sundberg; Alan C Farney; Erica L Hartmann; Phillip S Moore; Jeffrey Rogers; Samy S Iskandar; Michael D Gautreaux; David F Kiger; William Doares; Teresa K Anderson; Gloria Hairston; Patricia L Adams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Transplantation: can a single criterion determine the use of ECD kidneys?

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Paolo Rigotti
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Transplantation: pediatric en bloc kidneys are suitable for adult recipients.

Authors:  Edward J Alfrey; Christine S Hwang
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Outcomes of transplanting deceased-donor kidneys between elderly donors and recipients.

Authors:  Markus Giessing; T Florian Fuller; Frank Friedersdorff; Serdar Deger; Andreas Wille; Hans-Hellmut Neumayer; Danilo Schmidt; Klemens Budde; Lutz Liefeldt
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Increased kidney transplantation utilizing expanded criteria deceased organ donors with results comparable to standard criteria donor transplant.

Authors:  Robert J Stratta; Michael S Rohr; Aimee K Sundberg; Greg Armstrong; Gloria Hairston; Erica Hartmann; Alan C Farney; Julie Roskopf; Samy S Iskandar; Patricia L Adams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Outcome of expanded criteria donor kidneys that were transplanted at other Eurotransplant centers after being rejected by our institution.

Authors:  F Friedersdorff; C Roller; G Klein; P Werthemann; H Cash; K Budde; T Slowinski; C Kempkensteffen; J Busch; T F Fuller; M Giessing
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Dual kidney transplantation from expanded criteria deceased donors: Initial experience from single center.

Authors:  Pranjal Modi; Jamal Rizvi; Bipinchandra Pal; Hargovind Trivedi; Veena Shah; Manisha Modi; Aruna Vanikar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

Review 8.  Challenges of organ shortage for transplantation: solutions and opportunities.

Authors:  R F Saidi; S K Hejazii Kenari
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2014

9.  Dual kidney transplantation offers a safe and effective way to use kidneys from deceased donors older than 70 years.

Authors:  Kyo Won Lee; Jae Berm Park; So Ra Cha; Seo Hee Lee; Young Jae Chung; Heejin Yoo; Kyunga Kim; Sung Joo Kim
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.388

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.