Literature DB >> 8990365

The impact of a positive crossmatch upon outcome after liver transplantation.

W C Goggins1, R A Fisher, P M Kimball, L Wolfe, B E Hill, T D Pietruszka, M L Shiffman, A J Sanyal, V A Luketic, J M Ham, M P Posner.   

Abstract

Recent reports have shown that liver allografts transplanted against a positive lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (CDC+) are susceptible to an increased frequency of rejection, and decreases in patient and graft survival. The implication of a positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM+) in liver transplantation remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine what impact a pretransplant IgG crossmatch due to CDC+ or FCXM+ had upon the clinical outcome following liver transplantation. Preoperative crossmatch status was determined prospectively in 110 consecutive liver transplants performed between July 1991 and January 1995. Allografts were divided into three groups: negative crossmatch (NXM), positive flow cytometric crossmatch FCXM+, and positive lymphocytotoxic crossmatch CDC+. Crossmatch status did not impact patient or graft survival. Actuarial patient survival was similar between groups at 12 months (88% vs. 95% vs. 92%, NXM vs. FCXM+ vs. CDC+) and 24 months (81% vs. 93% vs. 92%, NXM vs. FCXM+ vs. CDC+) (P=0.1938). Actuarial allograft survival was similar between groups at 12 months (76% vs. 93% vs. 85%, NXM vs. FCXM+ vs. CDC+) and 24 months (76% vs. 89% vs. 85%, NXM vs. FCXM+ vs. CDC+) (P=0.0738). CDC+ allografts had a significant increase in early rejection episodes compared with NXM (46% vs. 7%, CDC+ vs. NXM) (P=0.003) or FCXM+ allografts (46% vs. 10%, CDC+ vs. FCXM+) (P=0.006). CDC+ allografts experienced significantly more rejection episodes per year than NXM (53% vs. 20%, CDC+ vs. NXM) (P=0.015) or FCXM+ allografts (53% vs. 23%, CDC+ vs. FCXM+) (P=0.02). CDC+ allografts had a significant increase in numbers of additional nonconventional therapeutic interventions compared to NXM allografts (0.9+/-0.5 vs. 0.2+/-0.1, CDC+ vs. NXM) (P=0.039). The presence of cytotoxic antibodies pretransplantation is associated with increased incidences of early rejection, and rejection episodes per year. With careful monitoring and aggressive therapeutic interventions the presence of cytotoxic antibodies are not deleterious to patient or liver allograft survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8990365     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199612270-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

1.  Increased bile duct complications and/or chronic rejection in crossmatch positive human liver allografts.

Authors:  S Takaya; A Jain; A Yagihashi; K Nakamura; M Kobayashi; K Takeuchi; S Suzuki; Y Iwaki; A J Demetris; S Todo; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Not All Antibodies Are Created Equal: Factors That Influence Antibody Mediated Rejection.

Authors:  Carrie L Butler; Nicole M Valenzuela; Kimberly A Thomas; Elaine F Reed
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.818

3.  The effect of a positive T-lymphocytotoxic crossmatch on clinical outcomes in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Young-Kyu Kim; Seong Hoon Kim; In Sung Moon; Sung-Sik Han; Seong Yeon Cho; Tae You; Sang-Jae Park
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2013-03-26

4.  Influence of Preformed Antibodies in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Isabel Legaz; Francisco Boix; Manuela López; Rafael Alfaro; José A Galián; Santiago Llorente; Jose A Campillo; Carmen Botella; Pablo Ramírez; Francisco Sánchez-Bueno; José A Pons; María R Moya-Quiles; Alfredo Minguela; Manuel Muro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.