Literature DB >> 8988882

Novel adjuvants and vaccine delivery systems.

B Morein1, M Villacrés-Eriksson, A Sjölander, K L Bengtsson.   

Abstract

Conventionally the efficiency of an adjuvant is measured by the capacity to induce enhanced antibody serum titres and cell mediated immunity (CMI) to a given antigen. Nowadays the capacity of an adjuvant is also measured by the quality as well as the magnitude of the induced immune response, guided by the protective immune response required. Quality includes isotype and IgG subclass responses, T-helper cell responses characterized by the cytokine profile and cytotoxic T cells (CTL). In the early phase of immunization some adjuvants influence the antigen administration and uptake by a so-called depot effect exemplified by aluminium hydroxide gel and oil adjuvants, which possibly is not as desired as alledged. A modern depot is exerted by slow release formulations continuously releasing the antigen over a period of time or by pulses at intervals aiming at 'single injection' vaccine. Great efforts are made to formulate efficient delivery formulations targeting the antigens from the site of administration, to draining lymph nodes or distant lymphatic tissue or to mucosal surfaces by parenteral or mucosal administrations. Nowadays, non-replicating carriers besides replicating vaccines are formulated to induce mucosal immune responses encompassing secretory IgA and CMI. Efforts to evoke immune responses on mucosal membranes distant from the site of administration have resulted mostly in little success. For a long time it was considered that CTL under the restriction of MHC Class I only could be evoked by replicating viruses or intracellular parasites. However, novel adjuvant delivery systems readily induce CTL by delivering the antigen to the APC resulting in intracellular transport to the cytosol for the MHC Class I presentation system, as well as to the endosomal pathway for the MHC Class II presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8988882      PMCID: PMC7119835          DOI: 10.1016/s0165-2427(96)05697-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol        ISSN: 0165-2427            Impact factor:   2.046


  34 in total

1.  An experimental influenza subunit vaccine (iscom): induction of protective immunity to challenge infection in mice after intranasal or subcutaneous administration.

Authors:  K Lövgren; H Kåberg; B Morein
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Liposome-encapsulated antigens are processed in lysosomes, recycled, and presented to T cells.

Authors:  C V Harding; D S Collins; J W Slot; H J Geuze; E R Unanue
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-01-25       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Effective subunit vaccines against an enveloped animal virus.

Authors:  B Morein; A Helenius; K Simons; R Pettersson; L Kääriäinen; V Schirrmacher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Adjuvant-free IgG responses induced with antigen coupled to antibodies against class II MHC.

Authors:  G Carayanniotis; B H Barber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 May 7-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Subunit vaccines against enveloped viruses: virosomes, micelles and other protein complexes.

Authors:  B Morein; K Simons
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  The expression of hybrid HIV:Ty virus-like particles in yeast.

Authors:  S E Adams; K M Dawson; K Gull; S M Kingsman; A J Kingsman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Sep 3-9       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The adjuvant activity of aliphatic nitrogenous bases.

Authors:  D Gall
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 7.397

8.  An antigen chimera of poliovirus induces antibodies against human papillomavirus type 16.

Authors:  O Jenkins; J Cason; K L Burke; D Lunney; A Gillen; D Patel; D J McCance; J W Almond
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Cellular immune responses in the murine lung to local immunization with influenza A virus glycoproteins in micelles and immunostimulatory complexes (iscoms).

Authors:  P D Jones; R Tha Hla; B Morein; K Lovgren; G L Ada
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  Formation of virosomes from influenza subunits and liposomes.

Authors:  J D Almeida; D C Edwards; C M Brand; T D Heath
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effect of antigen encapsulation in chitosan particles on uptake, activation and presentation by antigen presenting cells.

Authors:  Bhanuprasanth Koppolu; David A Zaharoff
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Induction of long-term memory CD8(+) T cells for recall of viral clearing responses against influenza virus.

Authors:  Georgia Deliyannis; David C Jackson; Nicholas J Ede; Weiguang Zeng; Irene Hourdakis; Evaline Sakabetis; Lorena E Brown
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Comparison of humoral immune responses in dairy heifers vaccinated with 3 different commercial vaccines against bovine viral diarrhea virus and bovine herpesvirus-1.

Authors:  Luc DesCôteaux; Dominique Cécyre; Johanne Elsener; Guy Beauchamp
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Induction of cell death by saponin and antigen delivery.

Authors:  Ching-An Wu; Ya-Wun Yang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Lysine: Is it worth more?

Authors:  D Datta; A Bhinge; V Chandran
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.058

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.