Literature DB >> 8988740

Recruiting cancer patients to participate in motivating their relatives to quit smoking. A cancer control study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 9072).

A Schilling1, M R Conaway, P J Wingate, J N Atkins, I M Berkowitz, G H Clamon, S M DiFino, V Vinciguerra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of cancer provides a teachable moment in which a physician can counsel or teach the patient. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B hypothesized that this teachable moment could also be used to encourage counseling of the patients' relatives who smoke. The authors' first study sought to determine the feasibility of such an intervention, the cooperation of the patients, and the compliance of relatives who were smokers. The long-range goal is to recruit by mail a large population of adult smokers into an intervention program and to assist them in quitting cigarette smoking.
METHODS: Oncologists and their clinical research associates asked recently diagnosed cancer patients to identify their relatives who were smokers and assist in persuading them to quit. Consenting patients spoke to relatives and mailed them a personalized motivational leaflet along with a list of the benefits of quitting smoking. Intervention was continued only with relatives who were contacted in this manner. The participating physicians then wrote to the smokers, advising them to quit; enclosed with each physician's letter were the National Cancer Institute booklet "Clearing the Air," which is about quitting smoking, and a questionnaire determining "stage of change" (the stage of the smoker's inaction or action regarding quitting smoking). After 6 months, a postintervention questionnaire was mailed to the relatives.
RESULTS: Written consent was obtained from 89% of 144 eligible patients solicited. Eighty percent of patients involved in the study contacted relatives. Sixty-three percent of contacted relatives returned the first questionnaire and 40% answered the second. Nine percent of all contacted relatives reported having quit smoking after the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: The intervention proved to be feasible and will lead to the next study, which will randomize relatives who smoke within a more intensive intervention over 12 months and compare the results with nonintervention controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8988740     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970101)79:1<152::aid-cncr22>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  3 in total

1.  An evidence-based cessation strategy using rural smokers' experiences with tobacco.

Authors:  Karen M Butler; Susan Hedgecock; Rachael A Record; Stephanie Derifield; Carolyn McGinn; Deborah Murray; Ellen J Hahn
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 1.208

2.  Smoking concordance in lung and colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads and quality of life.

Authors:  Kathryn E Weaver; Julia H Rowland; Erik Augustson; Audie A Atienza
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Smoking cessation interventions in cancer care: opportunities for oncology nurses and nurse scientists.

Authors:  Mary E Cooley; Rebecca Lundin; Lyndsay Murray
Journal:  Annu Rev Nurs Res       Date:  2009
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.