Literature DB >> 8987974

X-ray crystallographic studies of alanine-65 variants of carbonic anhydrase II reveal the structural basis of compromised proton transfer in catalysis.

L R Scolnick1, D W Christianson.   

Abstract

The three-dimensional structures of A65F, A65L, A65H, A65T, A65S, and A65G human carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) variants have been solved by X-ray crystallographic methods to probe the importance of residue 65 and the structural implications of its evolutionary drift in the greater family of carbonic anhydrase isozymes. Structure-activity relationships in this series of CAII variants are correlated with those established for other carbonic anhydrase isozymes. We conclude that a bulky side chain at position 65 hinders the formation of an effective solvent bridge between zinc-bound water and H64 and thereby hinders solvent-mediated proton transfer between these two groups [Jackman, J. E., Merz, K. M., Jr., & Fierke, C. A. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 16421-16428]. Despite the introduction of a polar hydroxyl group at this position, smaller side chains such as serine or threonine substituted for A65 do not perturb the formation of a solvent bridge between H64 and zinc-bound solvent. Thus, the evolution of residue 65 size is one factor affecting the trajectory of catalytic proton transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8987974     DOI: 10.1021/bi9617872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Investigation of adenosine base ionization in the hairpin ribozyme by nucleotide analog interference mapping.

Authors:  S P Ryder; A K Oyelere; J L Padilla; D Klostermeier; D P Millar; S A Strobel
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 2.  Carbonic anhydrase as a model for biophysical and physical-organic studies of proteins and protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Vijay M Krishnamurthy; George K Kaufman; Adam R Urbach; Irina Gitlin; Katherine L Gudiksen; Douglas B Weibel; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Structural and catalytic effects of proline substitution and surface loop deletion in the extended active site of human carbonic anhydrase II.

Authors:  Christopher D Boone; Valerio Rasi; Chingkuang Tu; Robert McKenna
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.542

4.  Structural features that govern enzymatic activity in carbonic anhydrase from a low-temperature adapted fish, Chionodraco hamatus.

Authors:  Stefano Marino; Kuniko Hayakawa; Keisuke Hatada; Maurizio Benfatto; Antonia Rizzello; Michele Maffia; Luigi Bubacco
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Crystal structure of human carbonic anhydrase II at 1.95 A resolution in complex with 667-coumate, a novel anti-cancer agent.

Authors:  Matthew D Lloyd; Richard L Pederick; Ramanathan Natesh; L W Lawrence Woo; Atul Purohit; Michael J Reed; K Ravi Acharya; Barry V L Potter
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Properties of intramolecular proton transfer in carbonic anhydrase III.

Authors:  C Tu; M Qian; J N Earnhardt; P J Laipis; D N Silverman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Exploration of the residues modulating the catalytic features of human carbonic anhydrase XIII by a site-specific mutagenesis approach.

Authors:  Giuseppina De Simone; Anna Di Fiore; Emanuela Truppo; Emma Langella; Daniela Vullo; Claudiu T Supuran; Simona Maria Monti
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.051

8.  Coupling Protein Dynamics with Proton Transport in Human Carbonic Anhydrase II.

Authors:  Srabani Taraphder; C Mark Maupin; Jessica M J Swanson; Gregory A Voth
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Predicting Protein-Polymer Block Copolymer Self-Assembly from Protein Properties.

Authors:  Aaron Huang; Justin M Paloni; Amy Wang; Allie C Obermeyer; Hursh V Sureka; Helen Yao; Bradley D Olsen
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 6.988

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.