Literature DB >> 8986876

Optic nerve regenerates but does not restore topographic projections in the lizard Ctenophorus ornatus.

L D Beazley1, P W Sheard, M Tennant, D Starac, S A Dunlop.   

Abstract

In adult fish and amphibians, the severed optic nerve regenerates and visual behaviour is restored. By contrast, optic axons do not regenerate in the more recently evolved birds and mammals. Here we have investigated optic nerve regeneration in a member of the class Reptilia, phylogenetically intermediate between the fish and amphibians and the birds and mammals. We assessed visual recovery anatomically and behaviourally one year after unilateral optic nerve crush in the adult ornate dragon lizard. Ctenophorus ornatus. Ganglion cell densities and numbers of axons in the optic nerve on either side of the crush site indicated that two-thirds of ganglion cells survived axotomy and regrew their axons. However, myelination fell from a mean of 21% in normals to 5.5% and 3%, proximal and distal to the crush, respectively. Anterograde labelling of the entire optic nerve showed that axons regenerated along essentially normal pathways and that the major projection, as in normals, was to the superficial one-third of the contralateral optic tectum. However, localised retinal injections indicated that regenerated projections lacked retinotopic order. Any one retinal region projected to the entire tectum. This feature presumably explains why the experimental lizards consistently appeared blind to stimuli via the regenerated nerve. Our findings indicate that although axons regenerate along essentially normal pathways in adult lizards, conditions within the visual centres do not allow regenerating optic axons to select appropriate central connections. In a wider context, the result suggests that the ability for regenerating central axons to form topographic maps may also have been lost in the more recently evolved vertebrate classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8986876     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19970106)377:1<105::aid-cne10>3.0.co;2-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  9 in total

1.  Topological specificity in reinnervation of the superior colliculus by regenerated retinal ganglion cell axons in adult hamsters.

Authors:  Y Sauvé; H Sawai; M Rasminsky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Retinal ganglion cell topography and visual acuity of the sleepy lizard (Tiliqua rugosa).

Authors:  Shaun T D New; C Michael Bull
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Regenerating reptile retinas: a comparative approach to restoring retinal ganglion cell function.

Authors:  D L Williams
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Regrowth of transected retinal ganglion cell axons despite persistent astrogliosis in the lizard (Gallotia galloti).

Authors:  María del Mar Romero-Alemán; Maximina Monzón-Mayor; Elena Santos; Carmen M Yanes
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  The role of colour in signalling and male choice in the agamid lizard Ctenophorus ornatus.

Authors:  N R LeBas; N J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Development of walking, swimming and neuronal connections after complete spinal cord transection in the neonatal opossum, Monodelphis domestica.

Authors:  N R Saunders; P Kitchener; G W Knott; J G Nicholls; A Potter; T J Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Three-dimensional evaluation of retinal ganglion cell axon regeneration and pathfinding in whole mouse tissue after injury.

Authors:  Xueting Luo; Yadira Salgueiro; Samuel R Beckerman; Vance P Lemmon; Pantelis Tsoulfas; Kevin K Park
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 8.  The progress in optic nerve regeneration, where are we?

Authors:  Jennifer Wei Huen Shum; Kai Liu; Kwok-Fai So
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  Cone and rod cells have different target preferences in vitro as revealed by optical tweezers.

Authors:  Robert J Clarke; Kormákur Högnason; Michael Brimacombe; Ellen Townes-Anderson
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 2.367

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.