Literature DB >> 8986618

Individual nuclei differ in their sensitivity to the cytoplasmic inducers of DNA synthesis: implications for the origin of cell cycle variability.

M Hola1, M Howard, F N Nawaz, S Castleden, R F Brooks.   

Abstract

Nuclei of multinucleate cells generally initiate DNA synthesis simultaneously, suggesting that the timing of DNA synthesis depends upon the appearance of a cytoplasmic signal. In contrast, intact nuclei from quiescent mammalian cells initiate DNA synthesis asynchronously in cell-free extracts of Xenopus eggs, despite the common environment. Here we show that the two nuclei of permeabilized binucleate cells enter DNA synthesis coordinately in egg extracts, as they do in vivo, with different pairs of nuclei initiating replication at different times. This indicates that the two nuclei of a binucleate cell are identical in their sensitivity to the inducers of DNA synthesis in egg extracts; this sensitivity varies in general between the nuclei of unrelated cells. The asynchrony of DNA synthesis shown by unrelated nuclei in egg extracts is therefore not an artifact of the cell-free system but a reflection of genuine differences preexisting within the intact cell. Evidence that these differences between nuclei are responsible for a substantial fraction of G1 variability in living cells is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8986618     DOI: 10.1006/excr.1996.0380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  3 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in nuclear transport does not affect the timing of DNA synthesis in quiescent mammalian nuclei induced to replicate in Xenopus egg extracts.

Authors:  W H Sun; M Hola; N Baldwin; K Pedley; R F Brooks
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Accumulation of cyclin E is not a prerequisite for passage through the restriction point.

Authors:  S V Ekholm; P Zickert; S I Reed; A Zetterberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Does size matter?

Authors:  William A Wells
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 10.539

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.