Literature DB >> 8986054

The influence of extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the soft tissue profile.

C Katsaros1, B Ripplinger, A Högel, R Berg.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to study profile changes following orthodontic harmonization of enlarged overjet and to attempt to trace predictive aspects regarding prognosis of the soft tissue changes. Lateral cephalograms and study models of 40 female patients, at least 12 years old at the start of treatment, with an overjet of > or = 6 mm were analyzed before (T1) and after treatment (T2). Twenty patients were treated without extractions, while in the remaining 20 patients extractions of premolars were carried out bilaterally in both jaws. The 2 groups were found to be highly homogeneous as regards overjet, cephalometric characteristics, space condition in the upper arch at T1 and both at T1 and T2 as regards age. The most striking aspect of the findings was the considerable amount of variability of the soft tissue changes. These changes were found to be rather unpredictable for the individual patient, since the regression models employed could give only a very wide individual prediction range. The relatively small changes registered, using superimposition methods, in both groups as regards the sagittal position of the lips in comparison to the very strong changes observed in relation to the esthetic line shows that the influence of the growth of the chin and/or the nose on the facial profile might be more important than the influence of the orthodontic treatment. The interpretation of the findings in the present study suggests that, apart from marked cases of skeletal convexity or concavity, the extraction versus non-extraction decision should be based primarily upon current knowledge of long-term stability of orthodontic treatment results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8986054     DOI: 10.1007/bf02215673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  13 in total

1.  The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment.

Authors:  R M Little
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1975-11

2.  A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients.

Authors:  D E Paquette; J R Beattie; L E Johnston
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.

Authors:  R S Nanda; H Meng; S Kapila; J Goorhuis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention.

Authors:  R M Little; R A Riedel; J Artun
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in postadolescent female patients.

Authors:  H G Hershey
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1972-01

6.  Changes in the relationship between the lips and the aesthetic line from eight years of age to adulthood.

Authors:  C M Forsberg; L Odenrick
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comments on nonextraction and extraction article.

Authors:  R Berg
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Effects of orthodontic treatment on the growth of individuals with Class II division 1 malocclusion.

Authors:  S E Bishara; A R Zaher; D M Cummins; J R Jakobsen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics.

Authors:  R M Little; T R Wallen; R A Riedel
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1981-10

10.  The prevalence of orthodontic extractions.

Authors:  J A Weintraub; P S Vig; C Brown; C J Kowalski
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effect of premolar extractions on incisor position and soft tissue profile in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion.

Authors:  Catharina Weyrich; Jörg A Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison.

Authors:  Johan Willem Booij; Juliane Goeke; Ewald Maria Bronkhorst; Christos Katsaros; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy--a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christian Kirschneck; Peter Proff; Claudia Reicheneder; Carsten Lippold
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effects of tooth extraction on smile esthetics and the buccal corridor: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsin-Chung Cheng; Yi-Chun Wang; Ka-Wai Tam; Ming-Fang Yen
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.080

5.  Morphological characteristics influencing the orthodontic extraction strategies for Angle's class II division 1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Yongwen Guo; Xianglong Han; Hui Xu; Dongqing Ai; Huan Zeng; Ding Bai
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.