Literature DB >> 8985063

Results of perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

F Agachan1, J Pfeifer, J S Joo, J J Nogueras, E G Weiss, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

The optimal surgical procedure for the management of rectal prolapse is still under debate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcome of perineal procedures in patients with rectal prolapse. Between April 1989 and April 1995, all consecutive patients at the Cleveland Clinic Florida who underwent Delorme's procedure or perineal rectosigmoidectomy with or without levatoroplasty for full-thickness rectal prolapse were evaluated. Clinical and physiological assessments were performed before and after surgery. A standard continence scoring system, based on the frequency and type of incontinence (0 = full continence, 20 = complete incontinence) was used to assess the results of each procedure. Additionally, morbidity and mortality, and clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated. Sixty-one patients underwent perineal procedures for rectal prolapse; 16 patients died from comorbid conditions after undergoing postoperative physiologic assessment. These 55 females and 6 males, with a mean age of 75 (range, 48-101) years were studied. Patients were followed up for 27.2 (6-72) months, and mean prolapse duration was 4.2 (0.2-30) years. Although mean preoperative incontinence score was 15.9 (8-20), it was 6.3 (range, 0-12) in postoperative course. Mean resection length of rectosigmoid was 23.3 (3-71) cm, and in these patients, two (3.3%) coloanal anastomotic leaks and four (6.5%) anastomotic strictures were observed. There was one postoperative death. There were statistically significant differences among the groups relative to short-term recurrence rates, postoperative incontinence scores, mean resection length, coloanal anastomotic stricture, and leak (P< 0.001). However, pre- and postoperative anal manometry did not reveal statistically significant changes (P > 0.05) in each group or among the groups. Perineal procedures were found to be safe and effective in eradicating rectal prolapse and improving fecal incontinence in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8985063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Anorectal Disease.

Authors:  P Huber; S Gregorcyk
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-06

2.  [Rectal prolapse in adults].

Authors:  W Heitland
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Sileri; Luana Franceschilli; Elisabetta de Luca; Sara Lazzaro; Giulio P Angelucci; Valeria Fiaschetti; Carolina Pasecenic; Achille L Gaspari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Functional outcome after perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Franc H Hetzer; Amir H Roushan; Katja Wolf; Ulrich Beutner; Jan Borovicka; Jochen Lange; Lukas Marti
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Eung Jin Shin
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-28

6.  Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Carey; P Higgs; J Goh; J Lim; A Leong; H Krause; A Cornish
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Delorme's Procedure: An Effective Treatment for a Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse in Young Patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli; Ali Reza Kazemeini; Amir Keshvari; Mohammad Reza Keramati
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2013-04-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.