Literature DB >> 8983318

Efficacy of ramipril versus enalapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

J Yasky1, M Verho, T P Erasmus, H G Luus, M Angela, L Grandin, M A Akbary, B Rangoonwala.   

Abstract

This double-blind, randomised, cross-over study investigated the antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril and enalapril was completed by 30 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a four-week placebo run-in phase, the patients received either 2.5mg ramipril or 10mg enalapril once daily for four weeks. The dosages were increased to 5mg ramipril and 20mg enalapril for a further four weeks. After a placebo washout phase of four weeks, the patients were crossed over to the alternative treatment. The decrease in average 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure from week 0 to week 8 was 1.6mmHg greater with ramipril than enalapril (90% confidence interval 0.6-2.7mmHg). The corresponding reduction in for systolic blood pressure was also greater with ramipril than enalapril by 2.4mmHg (90% confidence interval: 0.5-4.2mmHg). For the difference in the drop of 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure between ramipril and enalapril the lower level of the 90% confidence interval (CI) is above the clinically relevant difference of -3mmHg. This is an indication that ramipril (2.5 and 5mg dose) is at least as effective as enalapril (10 and 20mg dose) in decreasing blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. The duration of adequate antihypertensive effect was relatively long for both ramipril and enalapril; however, ramipril tended to have a more prolonged antihypertensive effect. Ramipril had a higher diastolic and systolic trough/peak ratio than enalapril, resulting in a more uniform antihypertensive effect over the 24-hour treatment period. Both ramipril and enalapril were well tolerated and the two treatment groups had similar safety profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8983318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pract        ISSN: 0007-0947


  2 in total

1.  Evidence for validity of a national physician and patient-reported, cross-sectional survey in China and UK: the Disease Specific Programme.

Authors:  S M Babineaux; B Curtis; T Holbrook; G Milligan; J Piercy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Risk of hyperkalemia in patients with moderate chronic kidney disease initiating angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers: a randomized study.

Authors:  Eugenia Espinel; Jorge Joven; Iván Gil; Pilar Suñé; Berta Renedo; Joan Fort; Daniel Serón
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-08-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.