Literature DB >> 8982130

Role of different loading conditions on resorption of hydroxyapatite coating evaluated by histomorphometric and stereological methods.

S Overgaard1, K Søballe, K Josephsen, E S Hansen, C Bünger.   

Abstract

The role of different loading conditions on resorption of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating was investigated in an experimental study. Resorption of hydroxyapatite was quantified by histomorphometric and stereological methods on backscattered scanning electron images. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants were inserted unilaterally into the medial femoral condyle of the knee in 14 mature dogs. Initially, all implants were subjected to controlled micromotion of 150 microns. After 4 weeks, the dogs were randomly assigned either to have the implant surgically immobilized to prevent further micromovement or to have a sham operation. Sixteen weeks after the first operation, the implants were analyzed. Six noninserted implants served as controls. The surface area and volume of the hydroxyapatite coating were reduced on the immobilized implants by 53 and 67% (p < 0.05), respectively, and were further significantly reduced on the continuously loaded implants by 83 and 87%, respectively, compared with the control implants. The hydroxyapatite coating was significantly thinner on immobilized (15 microns) and continuously loaded (15 microns) implants as compared with control implants (23 microns), but no difference between the inserted implants was found. Areas not covered with hydroxyapatite had 29 and 24% bone coverage on the immobilized and continuously loaded implants (not significant). Resorption of hydroxyapatite coating did occur in vivo. Continuous loading of the implants accelerated resorption significantly compared with immobilization of the implants. It is suggested that completely resorbed hydroxyapatite was partly replaced by bone in direct contact with the metal implant surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8982130     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100140607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

1.  Improvement in crystallinity of apatite coating on titanium with the insertion of CaF2 buffer layer.

Authors:  Su-Hee Lee; Hyoun-Ee Kim; Hae-Won Kim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Mechanical strength of ceramic scaffolds reinforced with biopolymers is comparable to that of human bone.

Authors:  S S Henriksen; M Ding; M Vinther Juhl; N Theilgaard; S Overgaard
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  On the fate of particles liberated from hydroxyapatite coatings in vivo.

Authors:  C F Dunne; J Gibbons; D P FitzPatrick; K J Mulhall; K T Stanton
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Cementless hydroxyapatite coated hip prostheses.

Authors:  Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; Jorge Gil-Albarova; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Elena Ibarz; Sergio Gabarre; Yolanda Más; Luis Gracia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nupur Kohli; Jennifer C Stoddart; Richard J van Arkel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effect of loading time on marginal bone loss around hydroxyapatite-coated implants.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Kyo-Jin Ahn; Pil-Young Yun; Minkyoung Kim; Hong-So Yang; Yang-Jin Yi; Ji-Hyun Bae
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-08-23

7.  Hydroxyapatite-coated implant: Clinical prognosis assessment via a retrospective follow-up study for the average of 3 years.

Authors:  Jun-Hong Jung; Sang-Yun Kim; Yang-Jin Yi; Bu-Kyu Lee; Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.904

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.