Literature DB >> 8979316

Ceramic anterior spinal fusion. Biologic and biomechanical comparison in a canine model.

S E Emery1, D A Fuller, S Stevenson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Three types of porous ceramic bone graft substitutes were used for anterior interbody fusion in the canine thoracic spine.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the biomechanical stiffness and histologic appearance of fused spinal segments using ceramic graft substitutes versus autogenous bone graft. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relative success or failure of ceramic grafts is influenced by many variables, including the composition of the ceramic, location in the spine, stability, and the animal model used.
METHODS: Four experimental groups were evaluated: autogenous tricortical iliac crest (n = 6); hydroxyapatite ceramic (Interpore-200; n = 6); biphasic (60 : 40) hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate ceramic (Zimmer; n = 4); and calcium carbonate ceramic (Inoteb; n = 4). All dogs were killed 8 weeks after surgery. After postmortem removal of anterior spinal instrumentation, the spinal segments underwent nondestructive biomechanical testing and light microscopic histologic evaluation.
RESULTS: Biomechanical testing showed that spines from the autogenous tricortical iliac crest group were statistically significantly stiffer in flexion, extension, left and right bending, and torsion than all ceramic groups. No differences in stiffnesses were observed among the three ceramic groups. Histologically, the autogenous tricortical iliac crest graft performed best, with osseous union at 10 of 12 interfaces. Of the ceramic grafts, hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate and calcium carbonate demonstrated more consistent junction healing than the hydroxyapatite group, where four of 12 interfaces resulted in a nonunion. In the ceramic groups, a variable amount of revascularization and new bone was observed within the grafts.
CONCLUSIONS: Autogenous iliac crest bone graft provides superior healing in this anterior spine fusion model. Additional investigation is needed before ceramic grafts can be considered satisfactory alternatives to anterior autogenous bone grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8979316     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199612010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal.

Authors:  Christian H Flamme; Nadine von der Heide; Caroline Heymann; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with carbon fiber cage loaded with bioceramics and platelet-rich plasma. An experimental study on pigs.

Authors:  Haisheng Li; Xuenong Zou; Qingyun Xue; Niels Egund; Martin Lind; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries.

Authors:  Hoon-Sang Sohn; Jong-Keon Oh
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2019-03-14

4.  Development of Phosphatized Calcium Carbonate Biominerals as Bioactive Bone Graft Substitute Materials, Part I: Incorporation of Magnesium and Strontium Ions.

Authors:  Ingo Sethmann; Cornelia Luft; Hans-Joachim Kleebe
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-12-02

5.  Contribution of the xenograft bone plate-screw system in lumbar transpedicular stabilization: An in vivo study in dogs.

Authors:  Sani Sarigul; Hakan Salci; Huseyin Lekesiz; Seref Dogan; Resat Ozcan; Osman Sacit Gorgul; Kaya Aksoy
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.