Literature DB >> 8978552

Comparison of Solubilization of Hydrocarbons in (PEO-PPO) Diblock versus (PEO-PPO-PEO) Triblock Copolymer Micelles

.   

Abstract

The solubilization of hydrocarbons by micelles formed of diblock and symmetric triblock copolymers in water are compared in the framework of a mean-field theory of solubilization. The block copolymers contain poly(ethylene oxide) as the hydrophilic block and poly(propylene oxide) as the hydrophobic block and are designated as EXPYEX or EWPZ (where E and P denote ethylene and propylene oxides and the subscripts denote the number of segments). In the presence of a variety of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbon solubilizates, the core radius, corona thickness, and aggregation number of the micelle and also the volume fraction of the hydrocarbon solubilized in the core are predicted. The calculations show that for identical molecular weights and block compositions, the diblock (E200P64) copolymer micelles have a much larger core radius, corona thickness, aggregation number, and volume fraction of the hydrocarbon solubilized in the core compared with the symmetric triblock (E100P64E100) copolymer micelles. In contrast, the diblock copolymer (E100P32), having the same block composition but half the molecular weight of the symmetric triblock copolymer (E100P64E100), gives rise to micelles having the same core radius, corona thickness, and volume fraction of the hydrocarbon solubilized as the micelles formed of the triblock copolymer, and an aggregation number twice that of the triblock copolymer micelle.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 8978552     DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0021-9797            Impact factor:   8.128


  4 in total

1.  Peripherally cross-linking the shell of core-shell polymer micelles decreases premature release of physically loaded combretastatin A4 in whole blood and increases its mean residence time and subsequent potency against primary murine breast tumors after IV administration.

Authors:  Rajesh R Wakaskar; Sai Praneeth R Bathena; Shailendra B Tallapaka; Vishakha V Ambardekar; Nagsen Gautam; Rhishikesh Thakare; Samantha M Simet; Stephen M Curran; Rakesh K Singh; Yuxiang Dong; Joseph A Vetro
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Formulation of Poloxamers for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Andrew M Bodratti; Paschalis Alexandridis
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-01-18

3.  Nimodipine-Loaded Pluronic® Block Copolymer Micelles: Preparation, Characterization, In-vitro and In-vivo Studies.

Authors:  Farzaneh Sotoudegan; Mohsen Amini; Mehrdad Faizi; Reza Aboofazeli
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.696

4.  Micellization of Sequence-Controlled Polyurethane Ionomers in Mixed Aqueous Solvents.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Timmers; P Michel Fransen; Jose Rodrigo Magana; Henk M Janssen; Ilja K Voets
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.985

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.