Literature DB >> 8977501

False-positive skin prick test responses to commercially available dog dander extracts caused by contamination with house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) allergens.

M J van der Veen1, M Mulder, A M Witteman, R van Ree, R C Aalberse, H M Jansen, J S van der Zee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In an outpatient population, a high frequency of positive skin prick test responses to dog dander was found in the absence of detectable IgE to dog dander in the RAST. The majority of these patients were sensitized to house dust mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) and had no obvious dog-related allergic symptoms. These findings prompted us to investigate whether dog dander skin test preparations are contaminated with house dust mite allergens in amounts sufficient to cause false-positive skin prick test responses in patients sensitized to house dust mites.
METHODS: Antigen detection assays with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies were used to determine concentrations of the major allergen Can f 1 from dog dander and the major allergens Der p 1 and Der p 2 from house dust mites in five commercially available dog dander skin prick test preparations (A to E).
RESULTS: Can f 1 concentrations varied for the different extracts (A: 170 micrograms/ml, B: 11.1 micrograms/ml, C: 13.3 micrograms/ml, D: 3.8 micrograms/ml, and E: 59.4 micrograms/ml). Der p 1 was detectable in all extracts (A: 33.4 ng/ml, B:5.1 ng/ml, C:29.6 ng/ml, D: 0.4 ng/ml, and E: 1.9 ng/ml), and Der p 2 was detectable in some of the commercially available dog dander skin prick test preparations tested (A: 31.3 ng/ml, B: 3.0 ng/ml, and C: 7.5 ng/ml). The median house dust mite threshold in the skin prick test was found to be 5.8 ng/ml, of Der p 1 (range, 3.5 to 20.8 ng/ml) in nine patients tested.
CONCLUSION: Contamination of commercially available dog dander skin prick test preparations with the major allergens (Der p 1 and Der p 2) of the house dust mite (D. pteronyssinus) was demonstrated. These contaminations cause false-positive responses to skin prick tests with dog dander in patients sensitized to house dust mite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8977501     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)80187-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  16 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory methods for allergen extract analysis and quality control.

Authors:  T J Grier
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.667

2.  Environmental assessment and exposure control of dust mites: a practice parameter.

Authors:  Jay Portnoy; Jeffrey D Miller; P Brock Williams; Ginger L Chew; J David Miller; Fares Zaitoun; Wanda Phipatanakul; Kevin Kennedy; Charles Barnes; Carl Grimes; Désirée Larenas-Linnemann; James Sublett; David Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; David Khan; David Lang; Richard Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Christopher Randolph; Diane Schuller; Sheldon Spector; Stephen A Tilles; Dana Wallace
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.347

3.  International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.

Authors:  Sarah K Wise; Sandra Y Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R Orlandi; Cezmi A Akdis; Jeremiah A Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M Baroody; Claus Bachert; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M DelGaudio; Charles S Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E Flanagan; Wytske J Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M Hohlfeld; Steven M Houser; Peter H Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd T Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M Laury; Stella E Lee; Joshua M Levy; Amber U Luong; Bradley F Marple; Edward D McCoul; K Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J Schlosser; Russell A Settipane; Hemant P Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R Tversky; Maria C Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  A nonallergenic birch pollen allergy vaccine consisting of hepatitis PreS-fused Bet v 1 peptides focuses blocking IgG toward IgE epitopes and shifts immune responses to a tolerogenic and Th1 phenotype.

Authors:  Katharina Marth; Isabella Breyer; Margarete Focke-Tejkl; Katharina Blatt; Mohamed H Shamji; Janice Layhadi; Anna Gieras; Ines Swoboda; Domen Zafred; Walter Keller; Peter Valent; Stephen R Durham; Rudolf Valenta
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 5.  Current immunological approaches for management of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma.

Authors:  Deepsikha Srivastava; Naveen Arora; Bhanu Pratap Singh
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 6.  Mechanisms underlying allergy vaccination with recombinant hypoallergenic allergen derivatives.

Authors:  Birgit Linhart; Rudolf Valenta
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Molecular allergology approach to allergic diseases in the paediatric age.

Authors:  Claudia Alessandri; Danila Zennaro; Alessandra Zaffiro; Adriano Mari
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 8.  Multiple grass mixes as opposed to single grasses for allergen immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  K Gangl; V Niederberger; R Valenta
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.018

9.  Novel birch pollen specific immunotherapy formulation based on contiguous overlapping peptides.

Authors:  Céline Pellaton; Yannick Perrin; Caroline Boudousquié; Nathalie Barbier; Jacqueline Wassenberg; Giampietro Corradin; Anne-Christine Thierry; Régine Audran; Christophe Reymond; François Spertini
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.871

10.  Dog saliva - an important source of dog allergens.

Authors:  N Polovic; K Wadén; J Binnmyr; C Hamsten; R Grönneberg; C Palmberg; N Milcic-Matic; T Bergman; H Grönlund; M van Hage
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 13.146

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.